Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Fenix Flexin Admits AI Role in “Rubberz” After Months of Denial

8/8/2026, 1:45:56 AM

Core Event: Admission and Ongoing Debate

Los Angeles rapper Fenix Flexin confirmed that generative-AI software was used in the creation of his viral single “Rubberz.” The statement reverses a pattern of evasive replies that had persisted since the track’s release in June.

Background & Context

“Rubberz” sparked immediate speculation because it departs from Flexin’s West-Coast trap style, embracing an 1980s-style synth-pop sound and a deliberately exaggerated British accent. The shift coincided with rapper Tyga’s public admission that his album *$tarface* employed AI, heightening scrutiny of AI’s role in mainstream hip-hop. Early analyses noted vocal timbres and high-note deliveries that differed from Flexin’s previous work, prompting listeners to question whether the track was human-made or AI-assisted.

Timeline

  • June 2024 – “Rubberz” is released and enters the Billboard Hot 100.
  • July 30 2024 – Producer Medasin posts a video alleging Flexin used the AI music platform Treblo (formerly Sonauto) to generate the track.
  • Early August 2024 – Flexin posts the Instagram comment admitting AI involvement but denying its use in the recording process.

Data & Statistics

  • Billboard performance: Complex reports the song peaked at No. 58 on the Hot 100, describing it as the first fully AI-generated track to chart. XXL lists the track at No. 66 on the same chart.
  • AI detection: Treblo’s proprietary detection tool flagged “Rubberz” as “very likely” generated by its model, and the company states the tool’s false-positive rate is below 1 in 10,000.

Official Statements & Responses

  • Fenix Flexin (Instagram, August 2024): Emphasized that AI was a “tool” and that it did not affect the recording process.
  • Treblo (company co-founder, August 2024): Confirmed the detection result, noting the low false-positive rate of the algorithm.

Criticism & Opposition

  • Medasin (producer, July 30 2024): Released a detailed breakdown highlighting a file named “Sonauto”—the former name of Treblo—and reproduced a similar song using Treblo prompts, arguing the platform could replicate the track’s sonic profile.
  • The Verge (analysis, 2024): Identified “artifacts and anomalies” typical of AI-generated music, such as brittle hi-hats, low-bitrate-style vocal compression, and abruptly cut reverb tails.
  • Charlie Harding (songwriter and music podcaster, 2024): Noted specific audio oddities that align with generative-AI signatures.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

Sources differ on the exact Billboard peak: Complex cites No. 58, while XXL cites No. 66. No publicly available forensic evidence definitively proves whether the AI-generated elements were inserted before or after the final mix, leaving the technical provenance of the track unresolved.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Ghostly backing vocals duck in and out unexpectedly. The drum reverb is full of unnatural digital artifacting reminiscent of a 64kbps MP3 downloaded off of Napster,” — Charlie Harding

Why It Matters / Impact

The “Rubberz” controversy arrived as a coalition of major record companies—including Sony Music, Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, BMG, Concord, HYBE, and Partisan Records—proposed new international principles for chart eligibility of AI-assisted recordings. The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) also released guiding principles on AI-generated music. The debate now centers on whether chart compilers and streaming platforms should require disclosure of AI involvement, and how listeners’ ability to detect AI-infused tracks may shape future industry standards.