Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Compensation Denial for Women Affected by India’s Largest River Project

8/15/2026, 9:42:00 PM

Core Event: Widows and Adult Daughters Excluded from Resettlement Payments

Pooja Gond, a 21-year-old widow from the village of Pathapur, has received no compensation after her husband, daily-wage labourer Parshuram, died following an untreated abdominal swelling. The family’s one-year-old son also died, believed to be from typhoid, without a medical diagnosis. When Pooja approached the Gram Panchayat secretary to add her name to the compensation list, officials told her she must pay 100,000 rupees to be considered. She could not afford the fee and spent 800 rupees on travel to Kishangarh and the district headquarters in Chhatarpur, yet her documents were repeatedly returned with no action. One of the two houses the family occupied was demolished without notice, and officials offered no alternative relocation site.

Legal Framework and Its Impact

The Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (LARR) Act defines “family” in Article 3(m) using a conventional household model. Development economist Bina Agarwal explains that the Act’s explanatory text treats every adult as a separate family, but the law’s main text does not. Consequently, widows, adult daughters and other female members are routinely omitted from compensation lists.

Personal Impact on Affected Families

Pooja’s 18-year-old daughter, Muliya, holds a voter ID and has voted, yet officials also deem her too young for compensation. Muliya suffers from persistent mouth sores and relies on seasonal collection of mahua flowers and chironji from the forest for income, food, and traditional medicine. She says, “The forest gives us everything.” Both women stress that monetary compensation alone is insufficient; they request land to remain close to the forest and sustain their cultural livelihood.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Article 3(m) of the LARR Act defines the family conventionally,” — Bina Agarwal

These elements illustrate how the current interpretation of the LARR Act leaves vulnerable women without the promised resettlement benefits, perpetuating economic hardship and cultural dislocation in the wake of India’s massive river development initiatives.