Home Office’s Family Migration Reforms Face Regulatory Criticism

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is advancing changes to the Immigration and Asylum Bill that would narrow the definition of “family” under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights to a spouse, parents or a child under 18. The bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 264-90 votes in July. The government reports that 77,000 applications were granted under Article 8 in the previous year. Home Office analysis estimates that about 55 percent of applicants refused under the new rules could remain in the UK without legal status and that the reforms could generate thousands of additional appeals and significant extra costs. The Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC) gave the Home Office’s impact assessment a red rating, describing it as “not fit for purpose” because the department did not sufficiently consider alternatives or explain the assumptions behind its analysis. The RPC noted that its rating is advisory and does not assess the policy’s merits.

iNews

Fourteen Labour MPs voted against the legislation at its second reading, and nearly 80 Labour MPs later signed a letter objecting to separate proposals to raise the qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain from five to ten years. The letter warned that applying the changes retrospectively would fail a “fairness test.” Veteran Labour peer Alf Dubs has accused ministers of “performative cruelty” and cautioned that the reforms risk sidelining basic human-rights protections. Labour representatives have also criticised the government’s “hostile rhetoric” on asylum and migration, suggesting the RPC’s red rating could encourage further rebellion within the party.

iNews

A Home Office spokesman said the RPC rating does not affect the bill’s progression through Parliament and emphasized that the opinion does not apply to the entire impact assessment. The department welcomed the RPC’s feedback, pledged to work with the committee, and indicated that revised sections would be resubmitted in September. The government maintains that the measures are needed to restore confidence in the asylum system, prevent abuse of legal protections and make it easier to remove individuals who have no right to remain.

iNews

According to the Home Office, the reforms could leave a substantial proportion of refused applicants in the country without status and trigger a surge in appeals, creating additional administrative costs. The RPC’s advisory red rating highlights gaps in the evidence base, leaving the ultimate effectiveness of the policy and its political ramifications uncertain.

iNews