Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

Prosecution Rests as Experts Clash Over Clancy’s Sanity

8/22/2026

27 5 Full Breakdown

Summary

Story summary

The defense rested, ending expert testimony on Lindsay Clancy’s mental state.
Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Phillip Resnick said Clancy was “frankly psychotic” with a command hallucination.
Prosecution psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack testified she had a major depressive episode yet understood right from wrong.
Clancy strangled children Cora (5), Dawson (3) and Callan (8 months) on Jan. 24, 2023 and faces life without parole if convicted.

History

Historical Context

In June 2001 Andrea Yates drowned her five children in Houston, leading to a 2002 trial that convicted her under Texas’s M’Naghten insanity test. The 2005 appeal reversed verdict after testimony, and a 2006 retrial found her not guilty by reason of insanity, noting 68 examples she recognized act’s wrongfulness. The case sparked debate over mental-health defenses and prompted calls to tighten insanity standards.

1 of 2

Story summary

The defense rested, ending expert testimony on Lindsay Clancy’s mental state.
Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Phillip Resnick said Clancy was “frankly psychotic” with a command hallucination.
Prosecution psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack testified she had a major depressive episode yet understood right from wrong.
Clancy strangled children Cora (5), Dawson (3) and Callan (8 months) on Jan. 24, 2023 and faces life without parole if convicted.

1 / 2