Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Trump-Oman Rift Over the Strait of Hormuz Amid the Iran War

8/23/2026, 12:23:48 AM

Core Event: U.S. Threats to Oman Over Strait Management

President Donald Trump has publicly threatened to “bomb the shit out of” the Sultanate of Oman unless it complies with U.S. demands concerning the Strait of Hormuz. He has also claimed that the strait has been reopened and that mines have been cleared, while vowing to declare the waterway U.S. territory. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned of sanctions if Oman proceeds with any service-fee scheme for ships transiting the strait.

Background & Context: Oman’s Historic Mediation Role

For more than a decade, Oman has served as a back-channel between Washington and Tehran. When the United States sought a way to discuss a nuclear agreement with Iran, Omani officials arranged a meeting so that American and Iranian delegations would not be seen entering together. That 2015 negotiation, described by senior U.S. negotiator Jake Sullivan as impossible without Oman, produced the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Oman’s practice of maintaining contacts with governments Washington cannot directly engage has made it a valuable regional interlocutor.

Data & Statistics: Shipping Disruption in the Hormuz Corridor

The Strait of Hormuz, a 21-mile-wide choke point where Omani and Iranian waters meet, carries roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied-natural-gas shipments. Since the February 2026 U.S.–Israeli attacks on Iran and Tehran’s subsequent drone, small-boat and mine assaults, commercial traffic has fallen to a “trickle.” Shipping-tracker data show passage rates dramatically below pre-war levels, though precise vessel counts have not been released.

Official Statements & Responses

  • Secretary of State Marco Rubio (press briefings, 2026): The strait must remain an “open and free waterway.”
  • Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (official communication, 2026): Threatened sanctions against Muscat if it facilitates fees for passage.
  • U.S. official familiar with deliberations (confidential source, 2026): Described Oman’s handling of negotiations as “dishonorable,” accusing Omani intermediaries of overstating progress while privately offering proposals the United States found unacceptable.
  • Omani diplomatic spokesperson (press interview, 2026): Asserted that charging for passage is “within the country’s legal rights” and that Omani lawyers believe such maritime fees are lawful under international practice.

Criticism & Opposition

Jon Alterman, chair of global security and geostrategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Oman has chosen a “non-aligned” stance “the way Switzerland is non-aligned,” implying that Washington’s expectation of Omani loyalty conflicts with the Sultanate’s independent diplomatic model. Omani officials have denied the U.S. claim that they delivered false statements to the press.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

  • Allegation of false statements: A U.S. official alleges Oman provided inaccurate public updates; Omani officials reject the charge.
  • Legal status of maritime fees: Omani lawyers cite international practice, but no definitive ruling has been cited.
  • Shipping volume data: Exact figures for vessel movements are unavailable, limiting quantitative assessment of the economic impact.

What’s Next

President Trump has pledged to declare the Strait of Hormuz U.S. territory and continues to press Oman on fee arrangements. Treasury Secretary Bessent’s sanction threat remains pending, and Omani officials say negotiations to restore commercial shipping are ongoing. The outcome will shape both the immediate flow of Gulf oil and the broader U.S. strategy for managing the Iran conflict.