Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Deposit Dispute Highlights Gaps in UK Rental Protection

8/25/2026, 11:57:51 AM

Deposit Dispute Overview

Raman Kaur and her family rented a house through the letting agency Morgan, Payne & Knightly (MPK) until they purchased their own home slated for September 2025. The family is still awaiting the return of their £900 tenancy deposit, which they later discovered was never placed in a government-approved deposit protection scheme. Kaur described the situation as stressful, noting that the loss of the deposit has forced the family to curtail spending for their children.

Agency Practices and Regulatory Findings

The landlord of the rented property—referred to as Vikram—reported that MPK claimed to be registered with a deposit protection scheme, a claim he says is false. Vikram also said he is owed £700 in deposit money and that MPK’s West Bromwich office has been closed, making contact with agency director Tony Singh impossible. An investigation by the BBC identified individual deposit sums owed by MPK ranging from £700 to £16,000. Vikram lodged a complaint with Trading Standards, prompting a formal review of the agency’s compliance.

Impact on Tenants and Landlords

The Kaur family’s experience illustrates how the absence of a protected deposit can jeopardize household finances, especially amid broader economic pressures. Vikram’s inability to retrieve his own owed deposit underscores that both tenants and landlords can suffer when agencies fail to adhere to statutory protection requirements. The situation has left both parties without clear recourse, as daily phone calls to Singh’s staff have gone unanswered.

Official Responses and Next Steps

Sandwell Council, the local authority covering West Bromwich, confirmed that Tony Singh and MPK are no longer operating within the borough, though the agency continues to function elsewhere in the West Midlands. Trading Standards is reviewing the complaint, but no definitive enforcement action has been announced. The investigation suggests that tenants and landlords should verify an agency’s registration with an approved deposit protection scheme before entering tenancy agreements to avoid similar disputes.