Full Breakdown
Adolescents Report Low Regret and High Satisfaction After Gender-Affirming Chest Surgery
8/30/2026, 1:49:40 AM
Study Findings on Adolescent Chest Surgery Outcomes
Researchers Maya Younoszai, Caleb Haley, Cole V. Roblee and colleagues published a cross-sectional study in the *International Journal of Transgender Health* that compared postoperative experiences of adolescents (under 18) with those of young adults (18-26). Participants were patients who received chest surgery at a pediatric hospital between January 2018 and April 2023 and were at least one year post-operation. Surveys were returned by 77 of 183 eligible patients (42 % response rate), including 42 adolescents and 35 young adults.
Context of Legislative Efforts
In recent years several U.S. states have introduced bills to restrict gender-affirming care for minors, often citing concerns that teenagers might later regret irreversible procedures. The new data provide patient-reported outcomes that directly address those policy arguments.
Quantitative Results
Using the Decision Regret Scale (0–100, higher = more regret) and the Satisfaction with Decision scale (1–5, higher = greater satisfaction), the study found a median regret score of 0 for both age groups and a median satisfaction score of 5, the highest possible rating. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between adolescents and young adults on either measure. A family-support questionnaire revealed a positive correlation between perceived family support and satisfaction, though the link to regret was not statistically significant. Five participants reported higher regret scores or mismatched regret-satisfaction responses; qualitative follow-up indicated dissatisfaction with aesthetic outcomes (e.g., keloids, uneven contours) rather than true gender-related regret. None expressed a desire to revert to their sex assigned at birth.
Limitations of the Survey
The median follow-up time was about 1.8 years, which may not capture long-term shifts in sentiment. The 42 % participation rate raises the possibility of selection bias, as individuals with higher regret might have opted out. Additionally, the sample was predominantly white, male-identified, and testosterone-using, limiting generalizability. Social pressures surrounding the politicized nature of gender-affirming care could also influence respondents’ willingness to report dissatisfaction.
Potential Policy Implications
The authors note that their findings align with earlier research on older patients, suggesting that adolescents process chest-surgery decisions comparably to adults. If regret remains low and satisfaction high, the empirical basis for age-based bans on gender-affirming chest surgery may be weakened, providing clinicians and policymakers with patient-centered evidence for future legislative deliberations.
