Full Breakdown
Next Secures Partial Victory in Long-Running Equal-Pay Litigation
9/7/2026, 8:49:14 PM
Core Event
On September 7 2026 (scheduled), the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) will rule on Next PLC’s appeal of a 2024 equal-pay judgment. The tribunal is expected to overturn the earlier finding that Next must pay its shop-floor staff the same basic hourly rate as its warehouse operatives. The decision leaves other equal-pay findings – night-time premiums, overtime, and paid-rest-break entitlements – untouched.
Background & Context
In 2024, an Employment Tribunal in Leeds concluded that more than 3,540 current and former Next store employees – predominantly women – were entitled to the same basic pay as the retailer’s largely male warehouse workforce. The ruling estimated potential back-pay liabilities of over £30 million. Since then, claimants have risen to over 6,000.
Data & Statistics
- Claimants: > 3,540 (2024) -> > 6,000 (2026)
- Basic-pay gap (2012-2023): £0.38 – £3.13 per hour in favour of warehouse staff
- Potential back-pay: > £30 million (Leigh Day, 2024)
- Next’s workforce: > 20,000 store staff across 458 UK and Ireland stores
Official Statements & Responses
Leigh Day, representing the claimants, reiterated that the tribunal’s findings on night-time premiums, overtime premiums and paid-rest breaks remain binding and noted that both the original tribunal and the EAT found “no direct sex discrimination” in Next’s pay-setting.
Criticism & Opposition
Leigh Day partner Elizabeth George called the basic-pay conclusion “disappointing” and said the firm will appeal the decision.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
The tribunals agree that store staff and warehouse operatives perform work of equal value and that no direct sex discrimination was proven. They diverge on whether Next’s market-rate justification is sufficient for basic pay. The EAT left the Sunday-premium issue open, stating it “remains to be determined” and should return to the Employment Tribunal.
Verbatim Quotes
- “I am also pleased that the tribunal upheld the findings on night-time premiums, overtime premiums and paid rest breaks.” — Elizabeth George, Leigh Day
- “The appeal tribunal’s conclusion on basic pay is disappointing.” — Elizabeth George, Leigh Day
What’s Next
Next will seek permission to appeal the remaining findings on night-time premiums, overtime, and paid-rest breaks. The claimants’ legal team intends to appeal the EAT’s basic-pay ruling. Both sides expect further litigation, with the unresolved Sunday-premium issue slated for a future Employment Tribunal hearing.
