Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Jerry Sandusky Withdraws Recantation Request in Latest Post-Conviction Hearing

9/9/2026, 3:01:22 AM

Remote Hearing and Shift to Federal Court

Former Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sand Sand appeared by video link from Laurel Highlands state prison during a Centre County hearing. On counsel’s advice, he and his lawyers withdrew the request to present a recanted testimony from accuser “R.R.” and will instead pursue a new-trial petition in federal court. Judge Maureen Skerda allowed the hearing to continue and dismissed the post-conviction relief request. Sandusky’s defense, led by Jerry Russo, noted that courts view witness recantations as “inherently unreliable,” prompting the pivot to the federal system.

Background & Context

Sandusky was convicted on 45 counts of sexual abuse on June 22, 2012, receiving a 30-to-60-year sentence. He has filed three state-court petitions for a new trial, all denied, and continues to assert his innocence. The scandal led to the firing of head coach Joe Paterno and to Penn State paying over $100 million in settlements to victims. One recanting accuser, identified in filings as Ryan Rittmeyer (Victim No. 10), previously received a $5.5 million civil settlement, with $2 million allocated to his attorneys.

Data & Statistics

  • 45 criminal counts.
  • Prison term: 30–60 years.
  • University settlements: >$100 million.
  • Rittmeyer’s civil settlement: $5.5 million (including $2 million attorney fees).

Official Statements & Responses

  • Jerry Sandusky told CNN, “Every one of those issues can be heard together by judges who have not already made up their minds about me.”
  • The Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General called the alleged recantation “highly suspect.”
  • Former prosecutor Joseph McGettigan argued the recantation was “induced” and not credible.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

  • Settlement totals differ: some sources cite “more than $100 million,” others “over $109 million.”
  • Rittmeyer’s affidavit claims he was “induced” to testify, while prosecutors maintain the original testimony was reliable. No independent verification is provided.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “I'm making this decision on advice of counsel,” — Jerry Sandusky
  • “I now regret my role in facilitating what I have come to view as a deeply flawed prosecution,” — Ryan Rittmeyer

What’s Next

Sandusky’s team plans to file a federal petition seeking a new trial, arguing that federal judges have not previously ruled on his case. No filing date has been disclosed. The outcome will depend on whether a federal court will entertain the claim that prior state proceedings were compromised.