Full Breakdown
Courts Block United States Postal Service (USPS) Mail-Ballot Rule as Civil-Rights Groups Seek Supreme Court Relief
By Drooid · · How we work
Federal Injunction Keeps Current Mail-Ballot System in Place
A district court in Boston found the Postal Service’s new ballot-mail rule likely unconstitutional and would make voter disenfranchisement “practically inevitable.” The First Circuit upheld that preliminary injunction, preserving the existing mail-ballot process through the November 3 election. The court warned that immediate enforcement would create “chaos and widespread disenfranchisement,” citing the impossibility of re-printing compliant envelopes and the “herculean task” of scanning tens of millions of ballot envelopes.
Legal Challenge and Amicus Brief
The injunction stems from a lawsuit filed by a coalition that includes the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, the Association of Americans Resident Overseas, the U.S. Vote Foundation, OCA – Asian Pacific American Advocates, and Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc., represented by the ACLU, the Brennan Center for Justice, the Legal Defense Fund, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, and LatinoJustice PRLDEF. On September 4, the coalition and 20 additional civil-rights groups submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court, urging the Court to reject the Trump administration’s request to stay the injunction.
New USPS Rule and Its Operational Requirements
The rule, issued under Executive Order 14399, would require states to submit voter-eligibility records to a new “U.S. Federal Ballot Mail Portal” and to receive USPS-generated lists of mail-voters. Ballot envelopes must meet precise design standards, including a minimum 0.25-inch gap between the “return service requested” line and the return address, and must carry unique barcodes. The portal, described by the Postal Service’s chief customer and marketing officer as slated for voluntary use “by sometime next week,” remains unavailable.
Local Impact: Leon County Envelope Rejection
Mark Earley, Supervisor of Elections for Leon County, Florida, reported that USPS initially rejected the county’s outgoing mail-ballot envelopes because the spacing between two elements was 0.236 inches—just 0.014 inches short of the required quarter-inch. After an appeal, USPS approved the design on September 10. Earley noted the brief rejection highlighted the rule’s potential to disrupt mail voting.
Official Statements & Responses
- The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to stay the injunction and allow the rule to take effect while litigation proceeds.
- U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that even if the injunction were stayed, states might not have time to comply, risking disenfranchisement.
- The First Circuit reiterated the district court’s finding that the rule would likely cause “chaos and widespread disenfranchisement.”
Criticism & Opposition
Civil-rights leaders contend the rule would suppress votes for groups that rely heavily on mail voting. Kalpana Peddibhotla warned that the loss of a mailed ballot is irreversible.
Data & Statistics
- In the 2024 federal election, nearly one-third of voters cast mail-in ballots.
- Thirty-six percent of naturalized citizens voted by mail, compared with 28 percent of U.S.–born citizens.
- Nationally, 47 percent of Asian American voters and 34 percent of Latine voters used mail voting.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
- The portal remains offline, creating uncertainty for states required to submit envelope designs and voter lists.
- The American Postal Workers Union reported that postal employees have not yet received training on the portal, leaving a critical implementation gap.
What’s Next
The Supreme Court is expected to rule soon on the administration’s request to stay the injunction. A decision to lift the injunction could force states and localities to scramble for compliant envelope designs and to navigate an as-yet-unavailable portal, potentially affecting the November 3 midterm election.