Full Breakdown
Kapil Sibal Calls for a Decade-Long Ban on Mid-Term Party Switches
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Proposal and Immediate Context
On September 13, 2026, former Union Minister Kapil Sibal addressed an event organized by the Kerala State Committee of the All India Lawyers Union (AILU) in Kochi. Speaking on “horse-trading and democracy,” Sibal urged that any Member of Parliament (MP) or Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) who changes party affiliation during an active term be barred from contesting elections or holding public office for ten years. He argued that the current Tenth Schedule, which treats a two-thirds crossover as a “merger,” enables walkouts that undermine voters’ mandates.
Background: Anti-Defection Law and Recent Defections
The anti-defection provision, inserted through the 52nd Constitutional Amendment in 1985, prevents elected representatives from switching parties after a mandate. Under the existing rule, a defection does not trigger disqualification if at least two-thirds of a legislative party’s members cross over, classifying the move as a merger.
Recent realignments have spotlighted this loophole:
- In the Lok Sabha, seven AAP Rajya Sabha members joined the BJP, invoking the two-thirds provision.
- The Trinamool Congress (TMC) saw 20 of its 28 Lok Sabha MPs announce a departure to form the Nationalist Citizens Party of India (NCPI) and support the BJP-led NDA.
- In West Bengal, a faction led by Ritabrata Banerjee claims the support of a majority of newly elected TMC MLAs, prompting an Election Commission review.
Data & Statistics
- The Constitution Amendment Bill on delimitation was defeated on April 17, 2026 in the Lok Sabha. Of 528 members who voted, 298 supported the bill, 230 opposed; a two-thirds majority of 352 was required.
- The AAP-BJP crossover involved seven Rajya Sabha members.
These figures illustrate how the two-thirds merger provision can reshape legislative majorities without triggering anti-defection penalties.
Official Statements & Responses
Sibal framed his proposal as a remedy to “foundational” damage caused by defections, emphasizing that the people’s mandate should not become a “transferable asset.” He called for a revision of the Tenth Schedule so that a merger reflects a genuine union of parties rather than a coordinated walkout.
The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) endorsed Sibal’s call. Founder Abhijeet Dipke described the measure as “the need of the hour,” while co-convener Saurav Das noted that the CJP’s charter already demands a 20-year prohibition on holding any public office for defectors.
Verbatim Quotes
- “Those in power will not hurry to close a loophole that benefits them. If one accepts that two-thirds of a legislative party may rewrite an election, it will subordinate the significance of the people’s will to post-poll arithmetic,” — Mr. Sibal
- “The harm caused by the reality of political defection is not technical; it is foundational,” — Mr. Sibal
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
- Sibal’s proposal: a 10-year ban on MPs/MLAs who switch parties after election.
- CJP’s charter: a 20-year ban on contesting elections or holding any public office for the same conduct.
The disparity highlights an unresolved policy gap: whether a decade is sufficient to deter defections or a longer prohibition is required.
Why It Matters
If enacted, a ban would alter the strategic calculus of party leaderships that rely on the two-thirds merger clause to secure post-poll majorities. It could affect the stability of coalition governments and the role of regional parties whose influence often hinges on legislative realignments. Critics warn that overly punitive restrictions might limit legitimate political realignments and infringe on representatives’ freedom of association.