Full Breakdown
Indian High Courts Trim Alimony and Refuse Maintenance in Recent Divorce Cases
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Rulings on Alimony and Maintenance
- Karnataka High Court (August 24 2026) – Justice D K Singh and Justice H Shanthi Bhushan cut a permanent alimony award from Rs 2 crore to Rs 50 lakh and ordered Rs 50,000 per month for the couple’s two children. The mother received exclusive physical custody; payment was to be made within three months, after which a 6 % annual interest applies.
- Calcutta High Court (order scheduled for September 9) – Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee dismissed a criminal case after settlement. The husband agreed to a one-time permanent alimony of Rs 13 lakh, payable in three instalments (first instalment of Rs 3 lakh already received). The settlement is tied to withdrawal of criminal and Domestic Violence Act proceedings and the final mutual-divorce hearing.
- Karnataka High Court (decision dated early September 2026) – Justice Geetha K.B. rejected a revision petition by Annapurna S. Hippargi, who claimed to be a second wife. Lacking proof that the husband concealed a pending appeal on his first marriage, the court denied maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
- Bombay High Court, Nagpur bench – Justices Urmila Joshi-Phalke and Raj Wakode rejected a husband’s divorce petition, finding no legal cruelty. The court upheld a Rs 5,000 per month maintenance order for the wife, noting her lack of independent income.
Background & Context
Alimony and maintenance in India are governed primarily by Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which mandates financial support for a spouse or children when the former cannot maintain themselves. Permanent alimony provides long-term security; Section 125 relief is often interim. Courts consider marital history, incomes, assets, and evidence of cruelty or concealment.
Data & Statistics
| Case | Final Award | Child Maintenance |
|---|---|---|
| Karnataka (2026) | Rs 50 lakh (permanent) | Rs 50,000 / month |
| Calcutta (2026) | Rs 13 lakh (one-time) | – |
| Karnataka (second-wife) | No maintenance | – |
| Nagpur (Bombay HC) | Rs 5,000 / month | – |
Official Statements & Responses
- Justice Geetha K.B. noted the petitioner had not specifically pleaded that the husband concealed the pending appeal, so the principle from *Badshah v. Urmila Badshah Godse* did not apply.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
- The Karnataka and Calcutta decisions show divergent approaches: one sharply reduced a long-term alimony figure, another approved a modest one-time settlement.
- No uniform guideline is cited for determining permanent alimony, leading to variability based on each bench’s assessment of financial positions.
- Detailed information on the husband’s income and assets appears only in the Karnataka case, limiting comparative analysis.
What’s Next
- In the Calcutta settlement, the second instalment of Rs 5 lakh will be paid when the criminal and Domestic Violence Act proceedings are withdrawn; the final instalment of Rs 7 lakh is tied to the final mutual-divorce hearing.
- The Karnataka High Court’s order includes a three-month deadline for payment of the reduced alimony, after which a 6 % annual interest will accrue.