Full Breakdown
Coalition Accuses Labor of Targeting Crime-Prevention Grants to Its Own Seats
By Drooid · · How we work
Grant Program Details and Allocation
A federal “Strengthening Community Safety” program, funded with a $560 million grant pool, allocated $20 million from an invite-only fund to install CCTV, lighting and other safety upgrades in electorates deemed critical before the May 2025 election. The program financed 20 upgrades; 17 of those upgrades were in seats Labor held at the time of the election. Non-Labor seats that received funding included Dickson and Petrie in Queensland, Deakin and Menzies in Melbourne, and Leichhardt (QLD) and Kennedy (held by independent Bob Katter). Specific allocations cited were $2.25 million for McEwen (VIC), $2.2 million for Parramatta (NSW), $2.2 million for Reid (NSW), $2.2 million for Richmond (NSW) and $2.2 million for Tangney (WA).
Official Statements & Responses
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected the opposition’s allegations as unfounded. He said, “It wasn’t so much a question as a smear. Its imputations are completely false.” — Anthony Albanese, prime minister. Albanese also asserted that the Coalition had pledged $1.6 billion in local-infrastructure commitments at the last election, arguing that “pork-barrelling” is a practice on both sides. — Anthony Albanese, prime minister.
Criticism and Opposition
Ben Small, the opposition assistant spokesman for infrastructure, argued that the data fails a basic plausibility check, noting that crime only seems to be a problem in Labor-held seats. — Ben Small, the opposition assistant spokesman for infrastructure. The opposition framed the grant allocations as a “hand in the cookie jar” that leaves taxpayers to foot the bill.
Future Oversight
In response to the controversy, the Greens secured a Senate inquiry into the $560 million safety program. The inquiry is slated to report its findings by mid-November.
Context and Political Implications
The dispute revives long-standing accusations of “pork-barrelling” and election-commitment funding, with the opposition claiming Labor used grant programs to favor its own seats, while Labor contends the allocations follow established precedent for funding election commitments presented by candidates. The Senate inquiry’s outcome may shape future rules on grant distribution and electoral funding transparency.