Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Delhi High Court Scrutinizes Police Refusal of Karni Sena Protest at Jantar Mantar

By Drooid · · How we work

Core Event

The Delhi High Court examined the Delhi Police’s blanket denial of permission to the Kshatriya Karni Sena to hold a peaceful protest at Jantar Mantar on September 20 (scheduled). The protest was intended to voice opposition to the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026, and to reservation policies. The bench, led by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, questioned how a complete ban could be justified and asked whether the venue could be changed or conditions imposed instead.

Background & Context

The Kshatriya Karni Sena, a right-wing cultural organization, sought to demonstrate against the newly notified UGC regulations that aim to promote equity in higher-education institutions. Earlier, the police had initially approved a demonstration for September 6 (occurred) but later withdrew consent on August 28 (occurred), citing security preparations for the BRICS Summit in Delhi. The organization subsequently rescheduled the protest for September 20, after the court suggested a date change on September 3 (occurred).

Timeline

Timeline
DateEvent
August 28Delhi Police denied the original request for a September 6 protest, citing BRICS Summit preparations.
September 6Initial date requested by the Karni Sena for the protest (later withdrawn).
September 3Court asked the petitioner to consider changing the protest date.
September 7High Court directed police to decide within a week on the September 20 application.
September 14Deadline set by the court for the police to communicate its decision on the September 20 protest.
September 20 (scheduled)Planned date for the protest at Jantar Mantar; police again refused permission.
September 22 (scheduled)Court listed the matter for further hearing.

Official Statements & Responses

  • Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma emphasized that a blanket ban is unacceptable, stating that the state may impose restrictions or change the venue but must not refuse a peaceful demonstration outright. She invited the police to propose alternative locations or conditions.
  • Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing the Delhi Police, explained that the refusal was based on “standing orders” and Supreme Court guidelines, describing Jantar Mantar as a “sensitive area.” He cited space constraints and the potential for “overspill” due to high social-media engagement as reasons for the denial.
  • The police indicated willingness to consider an alternate site if the court directed, and the ASG pledged to return with instructions on the matter.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

All sources consistently report the police’s refusal and the court’s questioning of a blanket ban. No contradictory figures or divergent accounts of the legal reasoning appear in the available reports. However, the precise criteria the police would apply to an alternative venue or specific conditions for the protest remain unspecified.

What’s Next

The bench scheduled a further hearing for September 22 (scheduled), during which the police are expected to submit either a revised permission with conditions or a proposal for an alternate location. The outcome will determine whether the Karni Sena can proceed with its demonstration on the originally planned date.