Full Breakdown
Supreme Court Directs Tamil Nadu to Identify Land for Navodaya Schools, Calls for Change in Hindi-Policy Mindset
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event: Court Orders Land Identification and Challenges Anti-Hindi Stance
On September 17, 2026, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court—Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih—reaffirmed its December 15, 2025 directive that Tamil Nadu must identify suitable government land in every district for Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs). The Court gave the state three months to complete the identification and urged dialogue with the Centre. It warned that Tamil Nadu “has to change the mindset” that Hindi cannot be taught, emphasizing cooperative federalism.
Background & Context: Navodaya Scheme Meets Tamil Nadu’s Two-Language Policy
Navodaya schools are centrally funded, residential institutions run by the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti under the Union Ministry of Education. The scheme follows the three-language formula (English, Hindi, regional language) in the National Education Policy. Tamil Nadu, however, operates a two-language policy under the Tamil Learning Act 2006, mandating Tamil and English as the only mediums of instruction.
In December 2017, the Madras High Court ordered the state to facilitate Navodaya schools, holding that the scheme did not violate the Tamil Learning Act. Tamil Nadu challenged that order, arguing that education is a concurrent subject and the three-language model conflicts with its statutory framework.
Data & Statistics: Land Requirements and Financial Stakes
- Land: About 30 acres per district are needed for a Navodaya campus.
- Financial outlay: Tamil Nadu cites a promised INR5,000 crore from the Centre under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan that remains unreleased. The state’s education budget is INR45,000 crore for roughly 1.24 million students; the Centre’s national allocation stands at INR78,000 crore.
- Academic performance: Navodaya schools nationwide record a 99 % pass rate in board examinations.
Official Statements & Responses
Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj (Centre) reiterated that the state’s sole obligation is to provide land, with construction and other expenses borne by the Union. He described the scheme as being at an early stage, allowing ample time to settle language-related differences.
Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta, for Tamil Nadu, argued that the Navodaya policy is optional and that mandamus would overstep constitutional limits. He highlighted the state’s financial constraints and the need to protect Tamil’s primacy in education.
Criticism & Opposition
Tamil Nadu’s legal team contended that the three-language framework imposes an “adamancy” of Hindi that supersedes the state’s language policy, violating the Tamil Learning Act. They maintained that the Concurrent List grants the state authority to frame its own curriculum and that the Navodaya scheme should not be forced upon it. Without the promised INR5,000 crore, the state warned that land-identification duties would strain resources.
Verbatim Quotes
- “I am opening my own model schools. May be my model is better than theirs,” — Mr. Gupta, senior advocate
- “It is against the State policy. It supersedes Tamil. This kind of unification is not the purport of the Constitution. It is not a Central government school. It is a school run by a society. There is an adamancy that Hindi must predominate.” — Justice Nagarathna
What's Next
The bench scheduled the next hearing for December 14, 2026, directing both the state and Centre to continue discussions on land identification, language policy, and related financial matters.