1 of 1
Story summary
- EPA allowed Bayer to select its own dicamba mitigation measures.
- Bayer chose the less restrictive volatility option, permitting applications up to 95 °F with reduced acreage.
- EPA approved Bayer’s request for an unproposed runoff option that permits full-field treatments at higher temperatures.
- Environmental groups sued, alleging EPA let Bayer “regulate itself” after dicamba caused drift damage and cancer links.