Full Breakdown
Allahabad High Court Quashes COVID-Era Criminal Case Against Two Men Linked to Nizamuddin Markaz Gathering
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event
On September 18, 2026, Justice Dr Gautam Chowdhary of the Allahabad High Court ordered the complete quashing of criminal proceedings against Mohd Faizan and an unnamed co-accused. The men had been booked in 2020 for allegedly attending a religious congregation at Delhi’s Hazrat Nizamuddin Markaz during the early COVID-19 outbreak. The bench held that the prosecution rested solely on a presumption of infection, while the applicants’ COVID-19 tests were negative, making the trial an abuse of process.
Background & Context
During the pandemic’s first months, Indian authorities invoked the Disaster Management Act 2005, the Epidemic Diseases Act 1897, and sections of the Indian Penal Code to prosecute suspected spreaders. Police alleged the two men traveled to the Markaz, returned to Jaunpur, and failed to inform officials, creating a fear of transmission. Similar charges were filed against other attendees.
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| April 2, 2020 | FIR registered at Shahganj police station (Jaunpur) under IPC §§ 188, 269, 307; Disaster Management Act § 51(b); Epidemic Diseases Act § 3. |
| May 8, 2020 | Police recorded statements before filing the charge sheet. |
| December 15, 2020 | Trial court took cognizance and summoned the applicants. |
| September 18, 2026 | Allahabad High Court quashed the proceedings. |
Data & Statistics
- Accused: 2 men (Mohd Faizan and a co-accused).
- Legal provisions cited: IPC §§ 188, 269, 307; Disaster Management Act § 51(b); Epidemic Diseases Act § 3.
- COVID-19 test results: Both applicants tested negative after quarantine; the State did not dispute these results.
Official Statements & Responses
The bench relied on Supreme Court precedents in State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal and Prashant Bharti v. State (NCT of Delhi), which allow courts to quash proceedings when the allegations, even if accepted, do not constitute an offence or when the case is manifestly mala fide. Accordingly, the High Court invoked its inherent power under Section 528 of the BNSS to dismiss the case.
The State’s counsel did not contest the applicants’ negative test results or the court’s view of the FIR’s speculative basis.
Why It Matters
The judgment underscores judicial scrutiny of pandemic-related prosecutions that rely on speculative infection risk rather than concrete evidence. By applying established Supreme Court criteria, the Allahabad High Court set a precedent that may influence pending cases against other participants of the Nizamuddin Markaz gathering.
What’s Next
With the High Court’s order, the criminal case against the two men is closed, and no further judicial proceedings are indicated. The decision may prompt review of other COVID-era cases filed on comparable grounds.
