Full Breakdown
Israel’s Election Committee Moves to Bar Arab Parties from October Ballot
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Decision: Disqualification Votes
Israel’s Central Elections Committee voted 31-4 to bar the United Arab List (Ra’am) and the Joint List—an alliance of Hadash, Ta’al and Balad—from the parliamentary election scheduled for October 27. The same vote also targeted two individual candidates: Hadash MK Ofer Cassif and Balad chairman Sami Abu Shehadeh. The bans are not final; the parties and candidates may appeal to the Supreme Court, and the individual disqualifications require separate judicial approval.
Background & Context
Under Section 7A of the Basic Law: The Knesset, a list or candidate may be excluded for denying Israel’s identity as a “Jewish and democratic state,” inciting racism, or supporting armed struggle against Israel. The provision has been applied sparingly; previous committee bans on Arab parties were overturned when the evidence failed to meet the “clear, convincing and unequivocal” standard. Ra’am served in the 2021 coalition, while the Joint List has represented Arab citizens since 2015.
Timeline
- September 8 2026 – Joint List members submitted their candidate list to the committee in Jerusalem.
- Wednesday (date not disclosed) – The committee cast the 31-4 and 18-5 votes to disqualify the two Arab slates and the two individual candidates.
- Next week – The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the disqualification petitions.
- October 27 – Election day, pending the court’s rulings.
Data & Statistics
A Channel 12 poll released on the day of the vote projected seven seats for the Joint List and five seats for Ra’am, compared with 50 seats for the current governing bloc led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The two Arab lists together claim representation of more than 1.25 million voters, roughly 20 % of Israel’s citizenry.
Official Statements & Responses
Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara argued that the petitions lacked the evidentiary threshold required for disqualification, stating that the cited quotations did not demonstrate that Ra’am rejects Israel’s Jewish character. She described the petition against Abu Shehadeh as having a “very thin” basis.
Supreme Court Justice Noam Sohlberg, who chairs the committee, warned that Section 7A is an instrument of “defensive democracy” and cautioned against over-broad application that could erode democratic values.
Likud petitioners maintained that party platforms, public statements and alleged links to charitable organizations supporting Hamas satisfy the statutory grounds, but the Attorney General’s office rejected that assessment.
Criticism & Opposition
Ra’am leader Mansour Abbas denounced the decision as “political, improper and anti-democratic,” accusing Netanyahu and his allies of trying to prevent the formation of a “next change government.” He framed the move as an attack on coexistence and democratic participation for Arab citizens.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
The Attorney General’s assessment that the evidence does not meet the legal standard conflicts with the committee’s majority vote. Petitioners cite a July 2025 Justice Ministry report linking Ra’am-affiliated nonprofits to Hamas; the Attorney General’s team characterizes those links as “very thin” and insufficient for disqualification. No definitive judicial ruling has yet resolved the discrepancy.
Verbatim Quotes
- “The committee is political and I had no expectations from it,” — Ofer Cassif, Times of Israel
- “The stronger the power, the greater the caution required in exercising it,” — Noam Sohlberg, Supreme Court President