Full Breakdown
Delhi High Court Seeks University Response Over Alleged Victory Processions in DUSU Elections
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event
On September 19, the Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) election results were announced. Advocate Prashant Manchanda petitioned that several winning candidates held victory processions despite a court order on September 18 prohibiting such celebrations. The Delhi High Court, in a division bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia, issued notices to Delhi University and all 140 candidates, directing them to respond to the contempt allegation and submit a dossier of relevant material.
Background & Context
The court’s September 18 intervention also sought explanations from student organisations about possible breaches of the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations on conduct and financing. The bench warned that failure to address “unruly conduct” could lead to a stay on vote counting. While noting an improvement this year—no defacement of public property—it stressed the need to curb displays of power.
Data & Statistics
- 140 candidates contested the DUSU elections.
- Election held on September 18; results declared on September 19.
- Faculty at Motilal Nehru College (Evening) reported an alleged assault on September 16, the final campaign day.
Official Statements & Responses
- Chief Justice Upadhyaya called the alleged processions “not done” and signaled a “very tough” stance on breaches.
- Justice Karia reiterated that the prohibition applied to candidates, supporters, and any individual on university grounds or public roads.
- Senior Advocate Kirti Uppal, representing Delhi University, noted that drums were not used this year and argued that the core concern is the exhibition of financial and physical power.
- The bench tasked Mr. Manchanda with compiling all pertinent evidence for further review.
- Delhi Police were assigned responsibility for ensuring compliance, with the court warning that violations could attract criminal, administrative, or contempt proceedings.
On-the-Ground Reports
Following the alleged assault of a faculty member on September 16, teachers at Motilal Nehru College (Evening) began an indefinite strike. Faculty expressed frustration over the lack of decisive action by the university administration and police, prompting solidarity protests from the Delhi University Teachers’ Association (DUTA) and staff at other colleges.
Why It Matters
The High Court’s scrutiny highlights tensions between student political activism and institutional governance at Delhi University. Enforcing the Lyngdoh Committee’s safeguards aims to prevent external political influence and intimidation tactics in campus elections. The faculty strike raises concerns about safety and the university’s capacity to protect staff during election campaigns.
What’s Next
The court has ordered the petitioner to submit a detailed dossier of alleged violations. After filing, the bench will consider imposing “exemplary electoral damages” on candidates or student organisations found to have breached the directives. Further hearings will determine whether contempt proceedings will be initiated and what penalties, if any, will be levied.