Story perspectives

Supreme Court Urges Speaker to Decide TMC MP Disqualification

By Drooid · Sep 24, 2026, 4:53 PM UTC · How we work

Summary

Supreme Court urges Speaker

Supreme Court urged Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to decide disqualification petitions against 20 rebel TMC MPs promptly.
Chief Justice Surya Kant’s bench flagged a three-month delay in ruling.
TMC general secretary Abhishek Banerjee sought an early anti-defection ruling.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed a judicial deadline, citing the Speaker’s constitutional role.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal warned the merger clause could nullify the anti-defection law.

Summary

Nagender contests Khairatabad

Danam Nagender announced he will contest the Khairatabad by-election after the Supreme Court upheld his disqualification.
BRS leaders are considering MLC Dasoju Sravan Kumar and a former minister as possible candidates for the byelection.
BJP floor leader Alleti Maheshwar Reddy said the party’s petitions helped secure the court’s decision against Nagender.
Senior BRS figure T. Harish Rao urged defected MLAs to resign and seek fresh mandates after the verdict.

History

Historical Context

In 1985, Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi secured Parliament’s passage of the Anti-Defection Amendment, adding the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution. Since then, the Supreme Court of India has adjudicated over 2,000 disqualification petitions, interpreting the law’s merger clause and speaker’s authority. Today’s Supreme Court urging Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to rule promptly on TMC MPs mirrors the 1985 intent to enforce the anti-defection framework. Consequently, the precedent pressures political parties like the BJP and BRS to respect constitutional disqualification norms, shaping future electoral contests.

1 of 3

Supreme Court urges Speaker

Supreme Court urged Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to decide disqualification petitions against 20 rebel TMC MPs promptly.
Chief Justice Surya Kant’s bench flagged a three-month delay in ruling.
TMC general secretary Abhishek Banerjee sought an early anti-defection ruling.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed a judicial deadline, citing the Speaker’s constitutional role.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal warned the merger clause could nullify the anti-defection law.

1 / 3