Full Breakdown
Israeli Election Panel Bars Arab Parties and Candidates Ahead of Oct. 27 Vote
By Drooid · · How we work
Election Disqualification Votes
The Central Elections Committee (CEC) voted to disqualify the Arab-led Ra’am party and the Joint List alliance for the October 27 parliamentary election. It also barred two Joint List candidates—Balad chairman Sami Abu Shehadeh (third on the slate) and Hadash MK Ofer Cassif (sixth). Votes were 18-5 to bar Ra’am, 18-5 to bar the Joint List, 19-5 to bar Abu Shehadeh, and 19-5 to bar Cassif. Separate petitions to bar the far-right Otzma Yehudit party were rejected 2-14.
Legal Framework & Background
Under Basic Law: The Knesset, Section 7A, a party or candidate may be barred for: (1) rejecting Israel’s existence as a Jewish and democratic state, (2) inciting racism, or supporting armed struggle against Israel. The Supreme Court requires “clear, convincing and unequivocal evidence” that a prohibited objective is central to a candidate’s activity.
Petitions against Ra’am alleged support for armed struggle and denial of Israel’s Jewish-democratic character, citing links to Hamas-affiliated charities. The case against Abu Shehadeh centered on an Arabic-language article he published on Oct 8, 2023, describing the Oct 7 attack as an “important historic event.” The petition against Cassif claimed his calls for international pressure and the release of Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti amounted to support for armed struggle.
Key Figures
- Sami Abu Shehadeh – Balad chairman, third candidate on the Joint List.
- Ofer Cassif – Hadash MK, sixth candidate on the Joint List.
- Itamar Ben-Gvir – National Security Minister, leader of Otzma Yehudit.
- Gali Baharav-Miara – Attorney-General, opposed most disqualification petitions.
- Noam Sohlberg – Deputy Supreme Court President, CEC chairman who voted on the disqualifications.
Official Statements & Responses
- Attorney-General Baharav-Miara said the evidence did not meet the statutory threshold, though she called the material against Abu Shehadeh “highly troubling.”
- Ben-Gvir dismissed the petitions as a political effort to eliminate his party.
- Sohlberg described Section 7A as an instrument of “defensive democracy” and warned that “the stronger the power, the greater the caution required in exercising it.”
- The Joint List condemned the votes as an attempt to “silence” Arab voters.
Criticism & Opposition
- Adalah, a legal-aid organization, argued the petitions failed to meet the high evidentiary bar and labeled the process “political persecution.”
- Cassif called the committee “political” and expressed confidence the Supreme Court would overturn his disqualification.
Data & Statistics
- Disqualification votes: Ra’am 18-5, Joint List 18-5, Abu Shehadeh 19-5, Cassif 19-5, Otzma Yehudit petition 2-14.
- Committee composition: 31 members voted on Abu Shehadeh (31-4 in favor), 30-4 on the Joint List, and 19-5 on Otzma Yehudit’s own petition.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
Sources differ on the Attorney-General’s stance: some note she “opposed” the disqualifications, while others highlight her “highly troubling” assessment of the evidence against Abu Shehadeh.
Verbatim Quotes
- “The attempt to disqualify me is an attempt to undermine the representation and political voice of Arab society,” — Abu Shehadeh
- “Israeli law does not permit barring a candidate from the Knesset simply for criticizing the army and the government for committing war crimes against Palestinians, and certainly not for supporting the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.” — Adalah, represented by Hassan Jabareen
What’s Next
The Supreme Court of Justice will hear appeals on the disqualification of Ra’am, the Joint List, Abu Shehadeh, and Cassif in the coming weeks. The court’s decision will determine whether any Arab parties or candidates appear on the ballot for Oct 27.