Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Iranian President Denies Nuclear Weapon Goal, Blames U.S. for Ongoing Conflict

By Drooid · · How we work

Core Event

In a Thursday interview with Fox News’ *Special Report*, President Masoud Pezeshkian flatly rejected the premise that Iran seeks a nuclear bomb, citing religious edicts that deem such weapons “unholy” and “illegal.” He said Iran is prepared to dilute enriched uranium and submit its nuclear facilities to international verification to ease tensions. Pezeshkian also placed primary responsibility for the nearly seven-month Middle-East war on the United States, accusing Washington of “bombing us first” and blocking diplomatic pathways.

Background & Context

Iran’s nuclear program has long been scrutinized for enrichment levels exceeding civilian needs. In June, Pezeshkian and former U.S. President Donald Trump signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) intended to halt hostilities and set a 60-day framework toward a broader agreement. The United States has responded with operations such as Operation Epic Fury (February) and Operation Outcast, alongside secondary sanctions aimed at pressuring Tehran.

Official Statements & Responses

Pezeshkian emphasized that Iran “has no problems” with the prior agreement and remains “ready” to move forward if the United States engages in dialogue rather than military action. Regarding a reported strike on a U.S.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “We have no problems. We did reach an agreement with your president,” — Masoud Pezeshkian, iranian president
  • “We do not seek to kill Americans, as shown by actions, demonstrable actions.” — Masoud Pezeshkian, iranian president
  • “CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP "I’m specifically unaware of these purported images that you talk about," Pezeshkian said.” — Masoud Pezeshkian, iranian president

Outlook and Implications

Pezeshkian’s willingness to lower enrichment levels and allow inspections signals a potential opening for renewed diplomatic talks, contingent on U.S. willingness to lift blockades and sanctions. However, his attribution of the conflict’s cause to U.S. actions and his denial of knowledge about the Jordan strike suggest continued mistrust. The next steps will depend on whether Washington chooses to engage in negotiations before upcoming U.S. elections or maintains its current pressure campaign.