Full Breakdown
President Droupadi Murmu Returns West Bengal ‘Anti-Goonda’ Bill Overlap with Central Narcotics Law
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event: Presidential Return Highlights Legal Conflict
President Droupadi Murmu sent back the West Bengal Public Safety and Control of Anti-Social Activities Bill, 2026—commonly called the “anti-Goonda” Bill—after the Union Home Ministry warned that its definition of “goonda” (Section 2(d)(iii)(B)) overlaps with the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act 1985 and the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (PITNDPS) Act 1988. The note cited a possible “parallel preventive-detention mechanism” and a risk of repugnancy under Article 254, prompting the President to return the Bill for reconsideration.
Background & Context
- The Suvendu Adhikari-led BJP government introduced the Bill in June 2026 and the West Bengal Assembly passed it on June 29.
- The legislation expands state powers to detain “goondas” for up to 12 months without trial and to bar them from entering a specified area for the same period.
- It defines a “goonda” to include anyone who commits, attempts, abets, promotes, finances or facilitates an offence punishable under the NDPS Act 1985.
- West Bengal already has a preventive-detention law from the 1970s; the new Bill seeks a broader ambit covering organised crime, illegal mining, cybercrime and public disorder.
- Under Article 200 the Governor may reserve a state Bill for the President; Article 201 gives the legislature six months to revisit a returned Bill.
Official Statements & Responses
- Union Home Ministry (note to the President) – The provision could create an overlapping preventive-detention framework with the PITNDPS Act 1988 and may be repugnant to Article 254; the reference to NDPS offences should be deleted.
- State administration senior official – “It’s a setback to the state government… there is a scope to get the Bill passed in the Assembly again after making some amendments… After that, it will be sent to the Rashtrapati Bhaban again for clearance.”
- Opposition leaders – Trinamool Congress, CPI-M and Congress welcomed the President’s decision, arguing the Bill was intended to suppress dissent.
Criticism & Opposition
- Subhankar Sarkar, Bengal Congress president, alleged that the Adhikari government wanted “to suppress opposition voices” and was therefore eager to enact the Bill.
- Opposition parties warned that the preventive-detention provisions could be misused against political opponents.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
- Chief Minister Adhikari claimed the “Goonda Daman Bill” had already received the Governor’s assent, become law, and had been invoked after the July 24 protest march at Esplanade.
- The state later informed the Calcutta High Court that the Bill was still awaiting presidential assent and therefore had not become law, contradicting the Chief Minister’s statements.
What’s Next
- The state must amend Section 2(d)(iii)(B) to remove the NDPS reference, re-table the Bill in the Assembly, and seek presidential assent again.
- Constitutionally, the legislature has six months from the President’s return to reconsider the Bill (Article 201).
- If re-passed, the Bill will be sent back to President Murmu for a final decision on assent.
Verbatim Quotes
- “It’s a setback to the state government, which had a plan to make it effective soon. But there is a scope to get the Bill passed in the Assembly again after making some amendments within the framework of the Central act. After that, it will be sent to the Rashtrapati Bhaban again for clearance.” — Nabanna