Full Breakdown
Veeramani POCSO Case: Legal Revival Sparks Political Showdown Ahead of Tamil Nadu Bypolls
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event
The POCSO case against Gem Granites founder R Veeramani was revived when a Special POCSO Court rejected a police closure report on August 19, 2026 and ordered further investigation. Veeramani was arrested on August 29, 2026, along with associate Shanthi and her husband Mahendra Simhan. On September 24, 2026 the Tamil Nadu government formed an all-women Special Investigation Team (SIT); senior IPS officers A. Arun and N. Kannan were placed on compulsory wait.
Background & Context
The controversy began in October 2025 when a child-rights activist handed a pen-drive with a video allegedly showing Veeramani assaulting a minor to the Anti-Vice Squad. An FIR was filed the next day. Police later filed a “Further Action Dropped” report on February 18, 2026, citing inability to identify the girl. The court’s refusal to accept that report led to the identification of nine survivors and the arrests above.
The case has become a focal point of the October 6 Assembly by-polls in Madurantakam and Dharapuram, with the ruling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) led by Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay using it to attack the opposition Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and former chief minister M. K. Stalin.
Data & Statistics
- Accused ages: Veeramani 84; Shanthi 60; Mahendra Simhan 63.
- Survivors identified: nine minor girls (Police, Sep 2026).
- Alleged settlement amount: INR70–80 crore (TVK minister Aadhav Arjuna, Sep 25 2026).
- Key dates: FIR Oct 7 2025; closure report Feb 18 2026; reopening Aug 19 2026; arrests Aug 29 2026; SIT Sep 24 2026.
Official Statements & Responses
- C Joseph Vijay: “This case came up even during the previous DMK government too, but they closed and hid that case and its history.”
- **M. K.
- Tamil Nadu Police: “A Special Investigation Team has been constituted to investigate the POCSO case related to Gem Granite’s R Veeramani.”
Criticism & Opposition
CPI(M) state secretary P. Shanmugam demanded suspension of officers linked to the earlier closure and called for a High Court-monitored SIT, arguing the case proceeded only because of judicial intervention, not political will.
On-the-Ground Reports
At a rally in Madurantakam on September 25 2026, Vijay urged Stalin to “open your mouth” on the matter, framing it as a test of the DMK’s commitment to women’s safety. TVK minister Aadhav Arjuna highlighted alleged financial settlements and demanded answers from the DMK.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
- FIR timing: Some sources cite October 6 2025 (pen-drive receipt); others record October 7 2025 (official registration).
- Closure rationale: Police cite lack of evidence; opposition alleges political pressure and undisclosed settlements. No independent forensic audit has been released.
What’s Next
The Madras High Court has ordered the SIT to issue weekly press releases. The by-polls on October 6 2026 will intensify the political contest over the case, with TVK and DMK positioning themselves as defenders of children’s rights.
