Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Employment Dispute at Wholesale Solutions Over Alleged Bullying

By Drooid · · How we work

Core Event

Former business and product development manager Taslim Parsons has lodged a personal grievance with New Zealand’s Employment Relations Authority, alleging bullying, derogatory emails, and a hostile work environment at Wholesale Solutions Limited. She resigned two days later and filed a formal complaint. Wholesale Solutions has filed a counterclaim, denying the allegations and asserting that Parsons misrepresented events, accessed company social-media accounts after her departure, and acted vindictively.

Background & Context

Wholesale Solutions, a sister company to Adulttoymegastore, grew its monthly revenue from NZ$40,000 to NZ$200,000 during Parsons’ tenure. The Relphs and Parsons reportedly socialised outside work before tensions arose. Issues cited include a disagreement over prosthetic underpants colour options, a contested condom order size, and a dispute over the use of Maori language (te reo) in customer correspondence.

Official Statements & Responses

Parsons contends she was repeatedly undermined, singled out for using “kia ora” and “nga mihi,” and forced to resign because the environment would not improve. Craig Relph counters that he exchanged 3,000–4,000 emails annually with Parsons, that isolated emails were taken out of context, and that he apologized for mistakenly taking the Coke, later returning the change. The company maintains it investigated the grievance independently, while Parsons says the investigation was inadequate.

Data & Statistics

  • Revenue increase: NZ$40,000 -> NZ$200,000 per month.
  • Email volume: approximately 3,000–4,000 exchanges per year between Parsons and Relph.
  • Financial claims: Parsons seeks NZ$40,000 for unjustified dismissal, NZ$10,000 for disadvantage, plus loss-of-earnings and legal-cost compensation.

What’s Next

Authority member Sarah Kennedy-Martin indicated a decision is expected within three months of the hearing. The outcome will determine whether Parsons’ monetary claims are upheld and how the counterclaim proceeds.