Full Breakdown
Chief Justice Surya Kant Engages Law Students on Protest Rights, Legal Education and Child Protection
By Drooid · · How we work
Open-House Session at Chanakya National Law University
On September 26, 2026, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant held an “unfiltered interaction” with law students at Chanakya National Law University (CNLU) in Patna. The event, described by the university as the first live, open-house dialogue between a sitting CJI and law students, took place in the Ashoka Auditorium and was attended by Patna High Court Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao (CNLU Chancellor) and Vice-Chancellor Prof Faizan Mustafa. Students asked about police action against peaceful protests, financial hurdles for first-generation advocates, tuition fees, collegium dissent confidentiality, and proposals to restructure legal education.
Background to Student Protests and Collegium Transparency
The discussion on police response was prompted by the July 20 protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, organized by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) against alleged NEET exam paper leaks. Those demonstrations ended on July 25 after Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned. On September 1, a CJI-led bench quashed the FIRs filed in connection with the July 20 clashes, excluding 2,873 individuals with prior criminal records.
The collegium system records dissenting opinions but does not publish them. The CJI defended this practice, citing concerns for the personal dignity of judges and candidates.
Key Issues Raised by Students
- Police response to peaceful protests – How courts would react to alleged police brutality.
- Financial challenges for first-generation lawyers – Difficulty entering the profession without networks or scholarships.
- Law school tuition and scholarships – Concern over soaring fees and inadequate aid.
- Collegium dissent confidentiality – Why recorded dissent is kept private.
- Legal-education reform – Prof Mustafa proposed compressing the five-year law degree into four years of classroom study followed by a mandatory court apprenticeship, eliminating the separate one-year practice requirement for judicial service exams.
Official Statements & Responses
- Support for first-generation advocates – Citing the *Sarika Tyagi* case, the CJI described a Young Lawyers’ Professional Assistance Fund as a structural necessity and pledged to address tuition and scholarship concerns.
- Education reform – The CJI welcomed Prof Mustafa’s proposal as “a new, welcome idea,” indicating openness to integrating courtroom experience into curricula.
- Child-substance-abuse framing – In a “Childhood Beyond Drugs” programme the same day, the CJI stressed that substance abuse among children is both a public-health and a child-protection issue, urging a “child-sensitive” approach to rehabilitation.
Patna High Court Chief Justice Rao echoed the call for more competitive, better-paid High Court clerkships to attract top talent away from corporate law.
Data & Statistics
- A study in *The Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia* estimates that more than one in five Indian teenagers are at moderate-to-high risk of substance use.
- The Supreme Court’s September 1 order left 2,873 protest-related individuals with criminal backgrounds outside the FIR-quashing relief.
Why It Matters
The CJI’s reaffirmation of students’ protest rights signals judicial willingness to intervene when constitutional freedoms are threatened. His endorsement of financial assistance for first-generation lawyers and the proposed overhaul of legal education could reshape the pipeline into the legal profession, potentially widening access and enhancing practical training. The stance on collegium dissent underscores ongoing debates about judicial transparency versus individual dignity.
Verbatim Quote
- “We must resist the tendency to define a child by the problem that has brought the child before us.” — Justice Surya Kant