Story perspectives

Supreme Court OKs SAVE Bulk Voter Checks by 6-3

By Drooid · Sep 28, 2026, 4:18 PM UTC · How we work

Summary

Story summary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration may use SAVE for voter checks.
SAVE links DHS immigration records with Social Security data and permits bulk searches, raising error concerns.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, warning that even a few lawful voters could be disenfranchised.
Texas flagged 2,724 potential noncitizens; a review found 578 (about 21%) were citizens.

History

Historical Context

In 1995, President Bill Clinton signed the National Voter Registration Act, mandating states to maintain accurate voter rolls and share data. The law provided $33 million to the Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration for integrated databases, covering roughly 1.5 million registrants. Today, the DHS-run SAVE system mirrors that data-sharing model, as Texas flagged 2,724 noncitizen suspects, with 578 confirmed citizens, echoing past concerns about roll accuracy. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent warns that, like earlier roll purges, erroneous deletions could disenfranchise thousands, prompting future legislative safeguards.

1 of 2

Story summary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration may use SAVE for voter checks.
SAVE links DHS immigration records with Social Security data and permits bulk searches, raising error concerns.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, warning that even a few lawful voters could be disenfranchised.
Texas flagged 2,724 potential noncitizens; a review found 578 (about 21%) were citizens.

1 / 2