Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Apple Ordered to Pay $5.7 Billion for Patent Infringement Over Haptic Technology

By Drooid · · How we work

Core Event: Jury Finds Apple Infringed Taction Patents

Background & Context

Taction Technology sued Apple in 2021, alleging the “Taptic Engine” incorporated its patented haptic inventions without a license. A San Diego district court dismissed the case in 2023; the Federal Circuit revived it in 2025 and sent it to trial. The trial began on September 14, and the jury returned its verdict on September 25, 2026.

Timeline

  • 2023 – Judge grants summary judgment to Apple.
  • September 14 – Jury trial commences.
  • September 25, 2026 – Jury awards $5,721,961,750 and finds no willful infringement.

Data & Statistics

  • Damages awarded: $5,721,961,750 (largest U.S. patent verdict to date).
  • Patents involved: U.S. Pat. No. 10,659,885 (claim 17) and U.S. Pat. No. 10,820,117 (claim 16).
  • Products implicated: Apple’s Taptic Engine in iPhone models since the iPhone 6s/6s Plus and Apple Watch models since the original Watch.
  • Jurors: Seven jurors deliberated for two days.

Official Statements & Responses

  • Apple: The Taptic Engine is “fundamentally different” from Taction’s technology and the damages figure is “entirely unsupported by the facts.” Apple will appeal and continue using the engine pending court action.
  • Taction: The company called the verdict a vindication of its patent rights after a five-and-a-half-year battle and said the award reflects the value of its haptic technology, which it also supplies to headphones and gaming headsets.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “We’re happy the jury found for Taction and vindicated its patent rights,” — Lance Yang, attorney for Taction.
  • “We strongly disagree with today's verdict and the damages awarded, which are entirely unsupported by the facts,” — Apple spokesperson.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

All sources report the same verdict amount and the lack of a finding of willful infringement. No source indicates an injunction or product redesign has been ordered; the award remains subject to post-trial motions and appellate review, so the ultimate financial impact on Apple cannot be confirmed.

What’s Next

Apple has filed a notice of appeal and will likely seek post-trial motions to reduce or overturn the damages award. The case will return to the Federal Circuit, where the infringement finding and the quantum of damages will be scrutinized. Until the appellate process concludes, the $5.7 billion figure remains a jury verdict rather than a final, enforceable judgment.