Full Breakdown
Israel’s Secret Submarine Deal and the Ongoing Inquiry
By Drooid · · How we work
Submarine Purchase and the State Inquiry
In 2012 Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved the acquisition of a German-built “Drakon” submarine and related vessels, a transaction that remained hidden from most of Israel’s defense establishment. The submarine arrived in Israeli waters on September 24 2026, as shown in images released by the IDF spokesperson’s unit. The secretive nature of the deal has been the focus of Case 3000, a state inquiry that began in 2021 and is scheduled to hold its final hearing on November 1. The inquiry is examining why the purchase was concealed and whether it endangered national security.
Historical and Strategic Context
The navy argues that Israel needs every submarine it operates, especially as regional rivals such as Turkey expand their fleets to 14 vessels and tensions flare over the Straits of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab. At the time of the 2012 approval, the Israeli defense establishment prioritized additional armored vehicles for troops in Gaza and Lebanon. During the 50-day Gaza conflict in 2014, many IDF casualties resulted from attacks on unarmored vehicles, leading officials to claim that earlier acquisition of armored vehicles could have saved lives.
Netanyahu also approved Germany’s sale of submarines to Egypt while Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood was president after his election on June 24 2012; Morsi remained in power until July 3 2013, by which time the deal was already in motion.
Official Positions
- Israeli Navy: States that the Drakon submarine is essential and that Israel requires all six existing submarines, plus any future additions, to meet security needs.
- Case 3000 Inquiry: Has identified gaps in the official record, noting that Netanyahu has not disclosed all details of the deal and may continue to withhold information.
- German Industry: Reports suggest that without Israel’s early commitment, Germany might have faced higher prices or production shutdowns for the submarines.
Criticism and Opposition
- Defense Officials: Argue that the secrecy jeopardized the IDF, noting that the lack of armored vehicles in 2014 contributed to casualties.
- Political Critics: Claim Netanyahu concealed the deal to avoid a political battle with the defense establishment and to claim sole credit for the submarine’s arrival.
- Investigative Reporting: Journalist Ronen Bergman reported that Netanyahu’s cousin, Natan Milikovsky, was involved in aspects of the naval contracts and that the secrecy may have endangered Mossad operatives on missions. Several officials testified that they spent significant resources trying to identify an “enemy” actor working against Israeli interests, only to learn from foreign allies that the source was Netanyahu himself.
Upcoming Hearing
The final hearing of the inquiry on November 1 will address the motivations behind the concealed purchase, the timing relative to other defense priorities, and the alleged connections to personal associates. Outcomes may influence future procurement transparency and the balance between naval capabilities and ground-force protection.