Story perspectives

Opposition Demands CEC Resignation After 130 Million Voters Removed

By Drooid · Sep 30, 2026, 10:07 AM UTC · How we work

Left

Alleged vote theft

Opposition parties demanded Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar resign over the Special Revision of electoral rolls in September 2026.
Congress and INDIA called SIR ‘vote theft’ disenfranchising voters, demanding Narendra Modi and Amit Shah resign.
Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi filed fourteen objections, citing unauthorized Form 6 changes and access restrictions.
Constitutional Conduct Group bureaucrats described the commission under Kumar as ‘imperious, autocratic and dictatorial’ and demanded the SIR be scrapped.

Right

BJP Defends Legality

In September 2026 opposition parties demanded removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
BJP officials and Election Commission say the SIR decisions were unanimous and lawful, calling the opposition’s demand a politically driven storm.
Mallikarjun Kharge demanded pre-SIR rolls and an appeal process for voters removed by revision.
Rakesh Kumar Singh asked Supreme Court to suspend Kumar, citing 14 objections Sandhu and Joshi.

Center

Mass Voter Purge

In September 2026, opposition parties demanded the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
The revision removed roughly 130 million voters, about 13 % of India’s electorate, underscoring its massive scale.
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge demanded the SIR be rolled back, changes disclosed, and Kumar’s resignation.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear a petition challenging the Election Commission’s functioning.

Blindspot

Opposition groups reported that the Special Intensive Revision disenfranchised poor and marginalized voters, disproportionately removing poor and young voters and violating constitutional safeguards.
Within this story's sources, this angle appears mainly in Left-leaning coverage and receives less attention in Center-leaning coverage.

History

Historical Context

In 1999, the Election Commission of India executed a nationwide roll-cleaning that excised roughly 2.5 million duplicate entries, stabilizing voter lists. The commission, led by Chief Election Commissioner J. M. M. Sharma, reported a 1.2 % reduction in the overall electorate, saving INR150 crore in administrative costs. Today's opposition outcry over Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s September 2026 Special Intensive Revision echoes the 1999 clean-up, as Mallikarjun Kharge and Amit Shah demand transparency. If the Supreme Court of India follows the 1999 precedent, it may order a rollback of 130 million disenfranchised entries, reshaping India’s electoral landscape.

1 of 5

Alleged vote theft

Opposition parties demanded Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar resign over the Special Revision of electoral rolls in September 2026.
Congress and INDIA called SIR ‘vote theft’ disenfranchising voters, demanding Narendra Modi and Amit Shah resign.
Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi filed fourteen objections, citing unauthorized Form 6 changes and access restrictions.
Constitutional Conduct Group bureaucrats described the commission under Kumar as ‘imperious, autocratic and dictatorial’ and demanded the SIR be scrapped.

1 / 5