Full Breakdown
Lindsay Clancy’s Post-Mistrial Hearing: Defense Shifts to a “No-Evidence” Argument
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event – Defense Argues Lack of Evidence at September 29, 2026 Hearing
On September 29, 2026, Plymouth Superior Court Judge William Sullivan heard oral arguments from defense attorney Kevin Reddington and prosecutors in the case of Lindsay Clancy, the former labor-and-delivery nurse charged with the murders of her three children. Reddington asked the court to enter a required finding of not guilty, contending that the Commonwealth had not produced sufficient proof that Clancy killed the children. The judge took the motions under advisement and scheduled a follow-up hearing for November 2.
Background & Context
The trial began in July 2026 and ended on September 4, 2026 when a deadlocked jury forced a mistrial. Jurors were split 11-1 in favor of a not-guilty verdict by reason of insanity; the lone holdout juror refused to acquit. After the mistrial, the defense pivoted to challenge the sufficiency of the prosecution’s evidence itself.
Data & Statistics
- Date of killings: January 24, 2023.
- Victims: Cora, Dawson, Callan (8 months).
- Charges: Three counts of first-degree murder.
- Jury split at mistrial: 11-1 for not-guilty by reason of insanity.
- Key hearing dates: September 29, 2026 (status hearing); November 2 (motion hearing).
Official Statements & Responses
Assistant District Attorney Shanan Buckingham argued that the Commonwealth had met its burden, describing the record as “voluminous” and labeling the defense’s new argument “laughable.” Judge Sullivan declined to rule immediately, noting that both sides need additional time to address pending issues, including the holdout juror’s conduct.
Criticism & Opposition
Legal analysts criticized the abrupt shift. Former federal prosecutor Sunny Hostin called the strategy “a terrible take,” while commentator Jonathan Turley likened it to a “Clue” screenplay with multiple endings. Buckingham emphasized DNA on exercise bands and testimony from Clancy’s ex-husband that placed her at the scene.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
- Prosecution claim: The Commonwealth presented physical evidence, including DNA on the exercise bands, timeline testimony, and statements from a hospital chaplain indicating Clancy’s awareness of her actions.
The dispute centers on whether the record meets the legal threshold for proof beyond a reasonable doubt, a question the court will address at the November 2 hearing.
Verbatim Quotes
What’s Next
Judge Sullivan will issue rulings on the defense’s motion to dismiss the charges, the request for a required finding of not guilty, and the investigation into juror Michael Desronvil at the November 2 hearing. Prosecutors have not announced whether they will seek a retrial, a plea agreement, or reduced charges. Clancy remains confined to a psychiatric facility pending resolution of the criminal case.