Full Breakdown
California Enacts Ban on Child Marriage
By Drooid · · How we work
California Enacts Ban on Child Marriage
Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1267, which eliminates all legal avenues for individuals under 18 to marry. The measure joins 17 other states that already prohibit child marriage and will become effective at the start of next year, rendering any ceremony involving a minor after that point void.
Background and Legislative History
The effort to end child marriage in California spanned nine years of advocacy by women’s-rights groups and survivors. Earlier attempts failed in 2018 after opposition from the American Civil Liberties Union and stalled again in 2023 during a committee hearing. Prior law allowed minors to marry with parental consent and a court order, a loophole the new bill removes entirely.
Key Figures
- Gavin Newsom – Governor of California, signed the bill.
- Courtney Stodden – Child-marriage survivor and advocate who testified at the signing; she married at 16 to actor Doug Hutchinson in 2011.
- Gail Pellerin – Assemblymember from Santa Cruz, co-author of the bill, cited personal observations of child marriages while serving as a local elections clerk and civil marriages commissioner.
Official Statements & Responses
“This is a long overdue measure to protect young Californians and minors. Today, California kids are safer than ever before,” — Gov. Gavin Newsom. Assemblymember Pellerin emphasized that survivors’ testimonies shaped the effort, noting the hidden coercion and abuse that can accompany a marriage entered into without genuine consent. Child-advocate Stodden described her own experience as “predatory” and “abusive,” underscoring the law’s intent to shield minors from similar situations.
What the Law Changes
Effective at the beginning of next year, AB 1267 bans any marriage involving a person under 18, eliminating the previous exemption that required parental permission and a court order. All ceremonies performed after the effective date with at least one underage participant will be considered null and void, closing a legal pathway that advocates argued endangered vulnerable youths.
