Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Private-Equity Firms Keep Funding the World’s Largest Emitters

By Drooid · · How we work

Core Investment Trend

Despite growing calls from governments and consumers for an energy transition, private-equity firms continue to pour capital into the most carbon-intensive sectors. A recent analysis by the Private Equity Climate Risks Consortium found that the portfolios of twenty leading firms back companies that emit roughly 1.5 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases annually—more than any nation except China, the United States, India and Russia. The firms collectively manage about $7.3 trillion in assets, giving them considerable influence over global financial decisions.

Scale of Assets and Emissions

The consortium’s review, based on PitchBook data and public filings, identified that the assessed firms own roughly 15,000 miles of pipelines, 124 GW of power-generation capacity across 370 fossil-fuel-powered plants, and hundreds of oil and gas fields. A prior PitchBook study estimated that private-equity investment in energy assets exceeded $1.1 trillion between 2010 and 2021, with the overwhelming majority directed at fossil-fuel projects. Investment in oil- and gas-transportation infrastructure alone reached $4 billion across 13 deals earlier in the year, up from $3.6 billion in the comparable period the previous year.

Financial Returns and Market Drivers

The consortium examined 145 oil- and gas-focused private-equity funds launched between 2001 and 2016, noting that investors contributed $190.4 billion and received $192.9 billion back—a net return of just 1 percent. Analysts link continued investment to the artificial-intelligence boom, as large data-centre projects—many powered by natural gas—receive private-equity backing. Roughly half of the top ten U.S. data-centre owners have private-equity investors.

Official Responses and Criticism

Parr also questioned regulatory capacity, noting that firms like Blackstone acquire utilities-related companies, complicating rate-payer oversight. Critics point to recent moves by firms such as EQT, which, despite branding itself as climate-conscious, may acquire AES Corporation—a company whose generation mix still relies on natural gas (?32 %), coal (?16 %) and oil (?2 %).

Verbatim Quote

“This industry doesn't get enough scrutiny and credit for its contribution to global emissionsâ?¦ It's a very opaque business model.” — Matt Parr