Full Breakdown
Kangana Ranaut Seeks Delhi High Court Protection of Personality Rights Against AI-Generated Content
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event: Petition for Interim Relief Over Alleged Unauthorized Use
Actor and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of Parliament Kangana Ranaut filed a suit in the Delhi High Court to restrain the alleged commercial exploitation of her name, image, likeness and other distinctive attributes. Her counsel argued that AI-generated material depicting sexual and pornographic content, as well as fake news falsely attributing statements to her, infringes on her personality and publicity rights. Justice Vikas Mahajan issued summons to the defendants and indicated that an interim order would be passed in the matter.
Background & Context: Evolving Personality-Rights Jurisprudence
Indian courts have increasingly recognized “personality rights” – the right to control the commercial use of a person’s name, image, voice, likeness, signature and other recognisable traits. The Delhi High Court has previously granted such protection to actors Amitabh Bachchan, Anil Kapoor, Rajinikanth, Jackie Shroff, Arijit Singh and Sonu Nigam, among others. Those rulings distinguished permissible public discussion of a celebrity from unauthorised commercial exploitation of the celebrity’s distinctive identity.
Legal Proceedings and Court Actions
- October 7 – Ranaut’s petition was lodged, seeking an injunction against the unauthorised use of her persona.
- October 8 – The court examined web links presented by Ranaut’s counsel, including an animated piece and a meme that the judge described as satirical. Advocate Saket Sikri, representing Ranaut, noted that some defendants had already removed the contested material after receiving a copy of the plaint.
- The court issued summons to the identified defendants and a notice on the application for interim relief. It also directed Ranaut’s counsel to file an amended memo of parties, reflecting the removal of certain defendants from the proceedings.
Official Statements & Responses
- Ranaut’s legal team emphasized that the relief sought is limited to the obscene and allegedly fake online content; the team is not pursuing removal of memes or other satirical material at this stage.
- Justice Vikas Mahajan indicated that the court would pass an interim order in Ranaut’s case and, in the same hearing, issued summons in a separate personality-rights suit filed by Telugu actor Vijay Deverakonda.
- Defendants (as reported by the court) have begun deleting some of the challenged content following service of the plaint.
Timeline
Why It Matters: Implications for AI-Generated Content and Celebrity Rights
Ranaut’s case highlights the legal challenges posed by AI-generated media that can create realistic yet false depictions of public figures. A successful interim order could set a precedent for how Indian courts address the intersection of personality rights and emerging digital technologies, potentially influencing future claims by other celebrities and public personalities.
What’s Next
The Delhi High Court has scheduled a follow-up hearing for February 3, 2027, at which the court will consider any further submissions and decide on the interim relief sought by Ranaut.