Full Breakdown
Legal Battles and Police Restrictions Ahead of the Jantar Mantar Protest
By Drooid · · How we work
Court refusals to list protest petitions
On October 9, 2026, the Delhi High Court declined to list two urgent petitions. One, filed by Uday Bhanu Chib, national president of the Indian Youth Congress (IYC), challenges the Delhi Police’s refusal to allow a peaceful demonstration at Jantar Mantar against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The second, filed by Nadeem Khan, president of the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR), seeks protection from an alleged oral warning of detention ahead of the protest on October 10. Acting Chief Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre said the matters will be heard on Monday, October 12.
Police denial of permission for the Cockroach Janta Party’s (CJP) protest
Joint Commissioner Nupur Prasad announced that the police rejected an application submitted on October 7 by Saurav Das, co-convener of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), for a protest on October 10. The rejection cited receipt only three days before the event, short of the 10-day notice required, (2) prior non-compliance with undertakings, and prevailing law-and-order concerns.
Background: SIR controversy and demand for CEC’s resignation
The protests are linked to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, which opposition groups allege has deleted millions of legitimate voters. The IYC and CJP demand Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation and an independent inquiry. The Election Commission maintains the exercise is a routine accuracy measure.
Legal arguments and constitutional claims
The IYC petition invokes Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b), arguing that the police’s “mechanical” refusal violates the requirement that restrictions on fundamental rights be reasonable, proportionate and based on an individual assessment. It contends that assembly regulation cannot be used for a blanket prohibition.
Security measures and detentions
In anticipation of the October 10 gathering, Delhi Police have:
- Issued prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) across New Delhi.
- Closed entry/exit gates at 57 metro stations and reduced train frequency from 9 p.m. on October 9.
- Mobilised roughly 23,000 Central Armed Police Forces personnel between October 8–12.
The CJP claims at least 10,000 people have been detained nationwide ahead of the protest.
Official statements & responses
- Nupur Prasad reiterated the 10-day notice rule and said the recent intimation failed to meet it.
- Acting Chief Justice Sambre questioned the urgency of the petitions, noting no written notice restricting travel or imposing house arrest.
- Abhijeet Dipke, CJP activist, dismissed the need for police permission, calling it “absurd.”
Criticism & opposition
CJP leaders describe the police actions as an attempt to “scare” the youth and suppress dissent. Dipke accused authorities of fearing “the youth in the country” and of shutting down trains and metros to deter participation. The party also alleges right-wing fringe groups have been mobilised to create violence, a claim denied by the Bajrang Dal.
Conflicting reports & gaps
- Detention figures: CJP’s claim of 10,000 detentions versus police statements that no formal arrests have been made.
- Permission status: CJP describes its October 7 submission as an “intimation,” while police maintain it was a procedural non-compliance.
What’s next
The Delhi High Court will hear the IYC and APCR petitions on Monday, October 12. Police indicated that prohibitory orders and metro restrictions will remain until “the situation normalises” after the October 10 protest.