Story perspectives

Supreme Court Orders Inclusion Appeals Before Exclusion Appeals

By Drooid · Oct 9, 2026, 10:36 AM UTC · How we work

Summary

Supreme Court Prioritizes Inclusion

Supreme Court ordered inclusion appeals be heard before exclusion appeals on Oct 9, 2026.
Over 22 lakh West Bengal voters were deleted in the SIR and filed appeals.
A total of 38.31 lakh appeals remain pending, with 37.05 lakh stuck in limbo.
Congress leader Prasenjit Bose warned the appeal backlog could take over 12 years to clear.
Lawyers urged that pending inclusion appeals be decided before the November 2026 Kolkata and Howrah elections.

Summary

ECINET Judges Report

Tribunal judges reported in August that the ECINET portal cannot add, delete, or issue notices.
The portal also lacks virtual-hearing capability, document-upload functions, and a way for appellants to download orders.
Judges said the system cannot restore a voter’s name after an order, blocking court-mandated reinstatements.
In September the Election Commission formed an independent expert committee to review ECINET’s flaws.

History

Historical Context

India’s recent push to expand electronic voting mirrors earlier U.S. experiments, such as the 1974 Video Voter DRE trial and the 1990 Federal Election Commission’s computer-voting standards. Those initiatives later revealed flaws, exemplified by North Carolina’s 2004 loss of 4,438 votes due to machine memory limits. The pattern shows new technology often outpaces safeguards.

1 of 3

Supreme Court Prioritizes Inclusion

Supreme Court ordered inclusion appeals be heard before exclusion appeals on Oct 9, 2026.
Over 22 lakh West Bengal voters were deleted in the SIR and filed appeals.
A total of 38.31 lakh appeals remain pending, with 37.05 lakh stuck in limbo.
Congress leader Prasenjit Bose warned the appeal backlog could take over 12 years to clear.
Lawyers urged that pending inclusion appeals be decided before the November 2026 Kolkata and Howrah elections.

1 / 3