Full Breakdown
Tennessee’s Botched Execution of Christa Pike Sparks Protocol Review
By Drooid · · How we work
The Botched Execution
On the evening of a late-September 2026 attempt at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, the state’s lethal-injection team administered two doses of pentobarbital to death-row inmate Christa Pike. The IV line failed to deliver the drug effectively, and Pike remained conscious, speaking, and was later transferred to an undisclosed hospital for medical care. Her attorneys say the team struggled to establish IV access, using at least seven needles, one of which bent at a 90-degree angle before removal.
Background of Tennessee’s Lethal-Injection Protocol
Tennessee’s execution procedures were first codified in a 2018 protocol that required a three-drug cocktail and mandated monthly and bi-weekly practice sessions in which the IV team inserted saline-filled lines into a volunteer “inmate” during rehearsals. In May 2022, Governor Bill Lee halted an execution of Oscar Franklin Smith and commissioned former U.S. Attorney Ed Stanton to investigate the state’s drug testing and procedural compliance. Stanton’s December 2022 report found that three drugs had not been properly tested for endotoxins and that the department had not followed its own protocol since 2018.
Following the 2022 findings, Tennessee paused executions and, in December 2024, the Department of Correction (TDOC) finalized a new protocol that reduced the manual from 99 pages to 44 pages and switched to a single-drug regimen of pentobarbital. The revised protocol was partially released in a redacted form in January 2025.
Changes to IV Training and Practice
The 2025 protocol eliminated the requirement that the IV team practice inserting lines during execution rehearsals. Training on vascular access is limited to the Special Operations Team, which administers the lethal chemicals but does not place IV lines. The earlier protocol had required the IV team—comprising at least two non-department personnel certified to place IVs—to practice with saline during monthly drills and a two-week pre-execution session.
Official Responses
Governor Bill Lee announced that the attorney-general’s office had retained Ed Stanton to conduct an outside review of Pike’s failed execution, focusing on compliance with the current protocol and any needed updates. TDOC has asserted that its staff followed the protocol but has not publicly explained the cause of the failure. In a November 2025 deposition, former TDOC Commissioner Frank Strada said the department did not hire a pharmaceutical expert and that any health-care consultant retained provided only IV training.
Criticism and Opposition
Thomas pointed to Arizona’s later adoption of quarterly live-IV training as a model Tennessee did not follow.
On-the-Ground Reports
Pike’s lawyers filed an emergency motion after the attempt, noting that Pike had previously warned the court that her small veins and a history of difficult blood draws could impede IV access. The motion seeks preservation of physical, written, and electronic evidence related to the execution.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
TDOC maintains that the protocol was adhered to, yet it has not identified why the IV line failed. Pike’s attorneys allege inadequate IV training and procedural changes as contributing factors, but no evidence currently links the rehearsal amendment directly to the botched execution. The state has declined comment on specific training practices and on whether additional IV-placement drills occur outside formal rehearsals.