Full Breakdown
Old Monk Rum Labeling Dispute Escalates in Bombay High Court
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event: FSSAI Bars Old Monk Sales in Maharashtra Over “Rum” Designation
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has prohibited the sale of Old Monk rum produced by Mohan Rocky Springwater Pvt Ltd in Maharashtra unless the label is changed from “rum” to “rum-like.” The ban, imposed after laboratory tests detected added rum flavouring, remains in force while the manufacturer challenges the order before a division bench of the Bombay High Court.
Background & Context
FSSAI’s authority over alcoholic-beverage labelling derives from the Food Safety and Standards (Alcoholic Beverages) Regulations, 2018, which require that a spirit’s name reflect its composition and that any added flavour be disclosed. The regulator has applied similar bans to variants of McDowell’s No. 1 Rum, Antiquity Blue Whisky, Royal Challenge Whisky, Bagpiper Deluxe Whisky and Old Cask Deluxe XXX Rum.
Key Figures & Groups
- Mohan Rocky Springwater Pvt Ltd – Manufacturer.
- Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) – Regulator.
- Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh – Represents FSSAI.
- Senior Advocate Venkatesh Dhond – Represents the manufacturer.
- Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna – Judges hearing the dispute.
Timeline
- August 2026 – FSSAI bans selected Old Monk variants after detecting added flavour.
- 31 August 2026 – Old Monk says it will drop the “7 Years Old Blended” tag and submit revised packaging.
- 3 September 2026 – Regulator tells the court Old Monk cannot be sold as rum because it uses neutral spirit and rum flavouring.
- 12 October 2026 – Matter heard; manufacturer submits loss estimates.
- 13 October 2026 – News outlets report the company’s claimed financial impact.
- 23 October 2026 – Court scheduled to hear the case on the merits.
Data & Statistics
- Manufacturer alleges losses exceeding INR500 crore from the restriction.
- Indian Express reports the company’s own estimate of INR50 crore profit loss.
- Manufacturer claims the Maharashtra State Excise Department has lost around INR350 crore in revenue.
- Approximately 300 workers at the Thane-district unit are idle.
Official Statements & Responses
FSSAI maintains that a spirit containing added rum flavouring cannot be marketed simply as “rum” because the label would not accurately convey its composition. Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh told the bench that sales could resume only if the product were described as “rum-like.”
Mohan Rocky Springwater argues its formulation complies with rules permitting approved additives in neutral-spirit blends. Senior Advocate Venkatesh Dhond noted that the same formulation continues to be sold from the company’s other Maharashtra units and that competing brands use similar processes without bans. The manufacturer offered revised labels that removed age-related descriptors and displayed “added flavour,” but FSSAI has not approved those drafts.
The Bombay High Court declined an interim stay on the prohibition in earlier hearings, leaving the ban in effect while substantive issues are examined.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
Sources differ on the magnitude of the loss: most cite over INR500 crore, while the Indian Express records INR50 crore. Neither the state excise department nor an independent audit has verified the INR350 crore revenue loss claim. The period covered by these estimates is not disclosed, and no official calculation has been released.
Verbatim Quotes
“The excise has also lost around INR350 crore in revenue,” — Venkatesh Dhond, senior advocate
What’s Next
The Bombay High Court will hold a final hearing on October 23 to decide whether the manufacturer’s challenge to the FSSAI prohibition succeeds and how the “rum-like” labelling requirement will be applied.
