Full Breakdown
Balkan Nations Split Over Israel Amid Gaza Conflict
By Drooid · · How we work
Overview of Divergent Policies
Across the Western Balkans, governments and political factions have adopted markedly different stances toward Israel since the Gaza war. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Albania, Kosovo and other states each pursue policies shaped by internal calculations rather than a coordinated regional agenda. The result is a patchwork of diplomatic gestures, defence contracts, and public statements that range from solidarity with Palestinians to support for Israeli actions.
Domestic Politics and Identity Factors
Analysts stress that domestic narratives dominate each country’s approach. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bosniak leaders link Palestinian suffering to their own 1990s experience of ethnic aggression, while Serb-majority officials in Republika Srpska back Israel. In Slovenia, left-right polarization drives a swing from a former centre-left embargo on Israeli goods to a current conservative push to restore ties. “The position towards Israel is strongly shaped by domestic politics and also national narratives, which makes a regional or even a country-specific position unlikely,” — Florian Bieber, professor of Southeast European history and politics at Austria’s University of Graz.
Defense Cooperation and Economic Interests
Serbia’s relationship with Israel now includes arms exports and a joint drone-assembly venture launched in September 2023. Kosovo’s 2020 Washington Agreement linked its diplomatic recognition of Israel to reciprocal Israeli acknowledgment of Kosovo’s independence, prompting the opening of an embassy in Jerusalem. Albania has deepened cooperation with Israeli cybersecurity firms after recent cyberattacks, aligning its foreign policy with Washington and the EU.
Political Rifts and Ideological Alignments
In Croatia, a split between Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic’s EU-aligned government and President Zoran Milanovic’s condemnation of Israeli military conduct has stalled a unified stance. Montenegro, North Macedonia, Romania and Bulgaria maintain cautious, EU-consistent language, avoiding high-profile disputes. Greece continues a robust strategic partnership, highlighted by a multibillion-dollar missile deal.
Implications and Outlook
The varied Balkan responses illustrate that regional Middle-East policy is largely transactional, driven by defence revenues, domestic identity politics, and the pursuit of leverage in Washington. As long as internal political calculations dominate, a cohesive Balkan position on Israel is unlikely to emerge.
Verbatim Quotes
- “The Balkan countries have almost no common positions at all, and so it’s not surprising their positions towards Israel and Gaza are all over the map,” — Marko Prelec, analyst at the International Crisis Group
- “Each country goes its own way.” — Marko Prelec, analyst at the International Crisis Group
- “The position towards Israel is strongly shaped by domestic politics and also national narratives, which makes a regional or even a country-specific position unlikely,” — Florian Bieber, professor of Southeast European history and politics at Austria’s University of Graz