Full Breakdown
JNU Dismissal and Political Fallout Over Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Congress MP Angomcha Bimol Akoijam
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event: Dismissal, FIR and Parliamentary Responses
On October 9, 2026, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) terminated Angomcha Bimol Akoijam, a professor in the Centre for the Study of Social Systems, after its Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) found the sexual-harassment allegations against him substantiated. The ICC’s inquiry, conducted under the POSH Act, was based on complaints filed by 11 female students in May 2026.
The Delhi Police registered a first-information report (FIR) on October 11, 2026 at Vasant Kunj North police station, invoking sections 75, 75(1)(i), 75(1)(iv) and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for sexual harassment and insulting a woman’s modesty. Akoijam was summoned and questioned for about two hours, describing the case as “political” and denying the allegations.
Background & Context
JNU’s ICC operates under the POSH Act, which mandates an internal inquiry when a student files a complaint. The committee examined the complaints, witness statements and other material before concluding that the conduct created an intimidating environment for women students. The university’s vice-chancellor announced the dismissal on the same day as the ICC’s recommendation.
Data & Statistics
- 11 female students filed complaints in May 2026.
- Dismissal order issued on October 9, 2026.
- FIR filed on October 11, 2026 under BNS sections 75, 75(1)(i), 75(1)(iv) and 79.
Official Statements & Responses
- BJP MP D. Purandeswari said the delegation had asked Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to refer the matter to the Ethics Committee and consider Akoijam’s status as an MP.
- JNU vice-chancellor Santishree D. announced the termination.
- JNUTA called the termination “hasty” and criticized the university’s handling of the case.
- Angomcha Bimol Akoijam claimed the university failed to provide a copy of the inquiry report, violating Section 16 of the POSH Act, and said his identity was disclosed prematurely.
Criticism & Opposition
- BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj questioned Rahul Gandhi’s silence, asking, “I want to ask Rahul Gandhi about his deafening silence.”
- BJP spokesperson Radhika Khera urged Congress to act against the MP, stating, “I am a living example of how women are treated in the Congress party.”
- JNUTA argued the decision was rushed and denied due process.
Verbatim Quotes
- “It is good. The merit of the case can be discussed in the court, rather than that 'khap panchayat' in JNU.” — Angomcha Bimol Akoijam
- “I don't have the report, I don't have this dismissal,” — Angomcha Bimol Akoijam
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
Sources differ on the exact number of complainants; most cite 11 female students, while some mention “13” or “15.” JNUTA’s description of the dismissal as “hasty” contrasts with the ICC’s finding of guilt, indicating disagreement over procedural adequacy.
What’s Next
The Lok Sabha Speaker will examine referral to the Ethics Committee. President Murmu has pledged an investigation, though no timeline is set. The police inquiry continues under the BNS provisions.