Full Breakdown
Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) Leaders Released After Extended Judicial Custody
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event: Release of Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka
A Special Executive Magistrate (SEM) in Delhi ordered the release of Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) co-convenors Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka after their judicial custody, initially imposed on October 14, expired. The magistrate accepted the sureties the leaders had furnished and lifted the two-day extension that began on October 19.
Background & Context
The protest that triggered the arrests took place on October 13 when Das, Ranka and campaign leader Ajinkya Shinde scaled the locked gates of Jantar Mantar and unfurled the national flag. The action was intended to oppose the Delhi Police’s decision on October 11 to withdraw Jantar Mantar’s status as an authorised protest site. CJP members have been campaigning for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, alleging irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
Timeline
- October 10 – Das and Ranka sign peace bonds after an earlier detention.
- October 11 – Delhi Police withdraw Jantar Mantar’s authorised protest-site status.
- October 13 – Das, Ranka and Shinde enter Jantar Mantar, wave the flag, and are detained.
- October 14 – The two leaders are remanded to five days of judicial custody.
- October 19 – The SEM extends custody by two days, citing concerns over a possible breach of peace.
- October 21 – The extended custody period ends; the SEM orders their release after sureties are accepted.
Official Statements & Responses
- Justice Subramonium Prasad, presiding over the Delhi High Court hearing, questioned the leaders’ legal strategy, noting that a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was not the appropriate remedy and urging the parties to await the magistrate’s decision.
- The Delhi Police, through its filing, argued that the leaders’ conduct showed “habitualness” in calling for protests at de-notified areas and that the sureties failed to satisfy verification requirements.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
Sources agree that the custodial extension was based on the magistrate’s assessment of potential peace-breach risks, but they differ on the weight given to the “habitualness” argument. The police narrative emphasizes public-order concerns, while CJP representatives stress procedural delays. No independent verification of the alleged threats to the magistrate or of the adequacy of the sureties has been provided.
Verbatim Quotes
- “The state is deliberately prolonging Ashu and Saurav's illegal arrest by using every dirty trick in the book to delay court proceedings and prevent their release,” — Abhijeet Dipke, CJP founder
What’s Next
The magistrate scheduled the leaders for a further appearance on October 21 to allow submission of fresh sureties if required. No additional hearings have been announced.