Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Alleged Misuse of Driver’s License Data by Kanagawa Police

By Drooid · · How we work

Core Event

The Kanagawa Prefectural Police are accused of retaining and improperly using personal information from expired driver’s licences that citizens submitted during renewal. According to the National Police Agency (NPA), the practice spanned more than three decades. The NPA has ordered the prefectural force to provide a full accounting and has launched a nationwide investigative team to determine whether the conduct violated Japan’s personal information protection law.

Background and Oversight

The National Police Agency, Japan’s central law-enforcement authority, supervises prefectural police forces and enforces compliance with privacy regulations. In recent years, the agency has heightened scrutiny of data-handling practices after several high-profile breaches elsewhere in the country. The current inquiry follows the agency’s routine audit procedures, which identified the Kanagawa records as potentially non-compliant.

Official Statements & Responses

NPA Commissioner-General Yoshinobu Kusunoki addressed the issue at a regular news conference on Thursday, emphasizing that police activities must adhere to existing statutes. He pledged that the investigation will be thorough and that any violations will be dealt with according to law. The Kanagawa Prefectural Police have not issued a separate comment beyond acknowledging the NPA’s request for clarification.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “It’s only natural to comply with laws and regulations in police activities. We take the acts of the Kanagawa Prefectural Police seriously because they should not have happened,” — NPA Commissioner-General Yoshinobu Kusunoki

Implications for Privacy Law

If the investigation confirms that the Kanagawa force used licence data beyond its lawful purpose, the case could set a precedent for how Japanese police agencies manage personal information. The personal information protection law mandates that data be collected only for specified, legitimate purposes and that retention periods be limited. A finding of violation may trigger revisions to internal protocols across all prefectural forces and could prompt legislative review to tighten oversight mechanisms.