Story perspectives

Election Commissioners Demand Action Against Maneesh Garg Over Orders

By Drooid · Oct 23, 2026, 4:06 AM UTC · How we work

Center

Executive Interference Warning

Election Commissioner Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Election Commissioner Vivek Joshi wrote to Cabinet Secretariat T V Somanathan on July 29 2026, seeking action against Senior Deputy Election Commissioner Maneesh Garg.
Garg assumed charge of the administration division on July 28 while Deputy Election Commissioner Bhanu Prakash Yeturu was on leave.
The Cabinet Secretariat acknowledged the letters and issued two statements: one warning that intervening might constitute executive interference, and another characterising the letters as personal, not an official Election Commission communication.
DoPT Secretary, Establishment Officer and Principal Private Secretary to the Chief Election Commissioner were copied.

Left

Commissioners Legal Objection

Election Commissioner Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Election Commissioner Vivek Joshi wrote to Cabinet Secretariat T V Somanathan on July 29 2026, requesting action against Senior Deputy Election Commissioner Maneesh Garg.
The warning said the work-allocation order could centralise election-administration power, undermining state-level oversight and transparency.
The Cabinet Secretariat, which had also warned that intervening might constitute executive interference, said the letters were personal, not an official Election Commission communication.
The commissioners said Garg’s order changed officers’ duties without Commission discussion, violating the 2023 Election Act.

Blindspot

Election Commissioner Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Election Commissioner Vivek Joshi warned that Maneesh Garg’s work-allocation order could centralise election-administration power, undermining state-level oversight and transparency, according to the left-leaning sources.
Within this story's sources, this warning appears mainly in left-leaning coverage and receives less attention in center-leaning coverage.

History

Historical Context

After the central government misused Article 356 over 90 times, the Supreme Court’s 11 March 1994 S. R. Bommai v. Union of India ruling required a floor test and a warning before dismissing a state ministry, curbing President’s Rule. Today Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi cite that precedent while warning that Maneesh Garg’s order could re-centralise election authority.

1 of 4

Executive Interference Warning

Election Commissioner Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Election Commissioner Vivek Joshi wrote to Cabinet Secretariat T V Somanathan on July 29 2026, seeking action against Senior Deputy Election Commissioner Maneesh Garg.
Garg assumed charge of the administration division on July 28 while Deputy Election Commissioner Bhanu Prakash Yeturu was on leave.
The Cabinet Secretariat acknowledged the letters and issued two statements: one warning that intervening might constitute executive interference, and another characterising the letters as personal, not an official Election Commission communication.
DoPT Secretary, Establishment Officer and Principal Private Secretary to the Chief Election Commissioner were copied.

1 / 4