Full Breakdown
Fifth Circuit Ruling Narrows Bond-Hearing Rights for Long-Term Undocumented Detainees
By Drooid · · How we work
Fifth Circuit Decision on Bond Hearings
A full-panel Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that three men detained under the mandatory-detention statute are not constitutionally entitled to bond hearings while awaiting removal. The court emphasized that years or decades of residence, community ties, and family connections do not create a due-process right to release on bond.
Legal Background and the Pending Supreme Court Case
The ruling resolves the constitutional question for the specific plaintiffs but leaves open the broader statutory dispute that the Supreme Court will address in *Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha*. That case concerns whether the mandatory-detention provision applies to long-time illegal entrants who were never formally admitted. A split exists among federal appellate courts: the Fifth and Eighth Circuits apply Section 1225 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, requiring mandatory detention without bond, while nine other circuits apply Section 1226, which permits bond hearings. The Supreme Court’s upcoming term will determine which interpretation governs.
Expert Perspectives on Potential Supreme Court Impact
Michael Morley, a constitutional-law professor at Florida State University, argued that the Fifth Circuit’s holding that detention does not violate the Due Process Clause may influence the justices’ reasoning, noting that courts often weigh constitutional concerns when interpreting federal statutes.
Official Judicial Commentary
Judge Leslie Southwick, dissenting in the Fifth Circuit case, warned that if the Supreme Court later rejects the panel’s statutory interpretation, the constitutional issue addressed by the Fifth Circuit would lose significance. She emphasized the importance of the case “at the moment” while acknowledging the potential for a different outcome on the high court.
What’s Next
The Supreme Court is slated to hear arguments in *Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha* during its upcoming term. The justices’ decision will determine whether long-term undocumented residents remain subject to mandatory detention without bond or gain access to bond hearings under Section 1226.