Full Breakdown
Instagram Restrictions Target Indian Political Cartoonists
By Drooid · · How we work
Instagram Blocks on Indian Cartoonists
For the second time in three weeks, Indian cartoonist Satish Acharya found his Instagram profile inaccessible to users in India. The account was first blocked from September 28 to October 6, displaying a notice that it was unavailable under India’s Information Technology Rules. A second three-day restriction began in early October, again without explanation. Earlier, fellow cartoonist Manjul had a post criticizing the Election Commission’s voter-roll revision temporarily hidden, though his profile remained searchable.
Legal Framework and Recent Enforcement
India’s Information Technology Rules empower courts and authorities to order social-media platforms to remove or restrict content deemed unlawful. Between March and July, government agencies issued nearly 195,000 blocking and content-restriction orders to platforms such as Instagram, Facebook and YouTube, according to figures obtained by the *Indian Express* through a right-to-information request. The rules are defended by officials as tools to curb unlawful material, while critics argue they are being used to curb political satire.
Reactions from Artists and Experts
Cartoonists say the lack of transparency hampers their ability to gauge what is permissible. Technology-policy expert Prateek Waghre notes that Meta appears more willing to comply with Indian orders than other platforms, though public data on compliance is limited. Veteran cartoonist Sandeep Adhwaryu stresses that opposition is inherent to the craft, warning that self-censorship may become normalized without explicit directives. Independent creator Rachita Taneja describes social media as a “double-edged sword,” arguing that platform compliance reflects commercial priorities rather than user-rights concerns.
Platform and Government Responses
Meta told the BBC it may temporarily restrict accounts to comply with India’s IT Rules but declined to provide details for Acharya’s or Manjul’s cases. The Indian government maintains that the rules help prevent content that could incite public disorder, though it has not responded to BBC requests for comment on the specific restrictions.