Full Breakdown
Election Commission Refuses to Disclose ECINET Software Details Amid SIR Controversy
By Drooid · · How we work
Core Event: RTI Denial on ECINET Software (Oct 16)
On October 16, the Election Commission of India (ECI) rejected a Right-to-Information request by activist M A Mujeeb Ayyub, refusing to reveal the name, version or architecture of the software that flags errors in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls. Citing Section 8(1)(g), the commission said disclosure could endanger life or safety and withheld details about the authority that reviews flagged anomalies.
Background & Context: SIR and Voter-Roll Deletions
The SIR, launched in June 2025, is a nationwide audit aimed at cleaning electoral rolls before upcoming elections. Reported deletions total 130 million names, affecting roughly 13 crore voters.
Data & Statistics
- 130 million voter-record deletions reported by multiple outlets.
- 13 crore voters excluded, according to the RTI response.
- 5.38 lakh voters in West Bengal removed via Form 7 objections (The Wire).
- 16 lakh appeals filed in West Bengal over three days as rolls were frozen for the April assembly election.
Official Statements & Responses
The ECI said no new software was developed for the SIR and that existing platforms operate under “strict data-security protocols.” It maintained that Election Registration Officers (EROs) are the statutory authorities for roll preparation and that queries about automated flagging, AI or machine-learning tools are “clarifications” not covered by Section 2(f) of the RTI Act. Former Chief Election Commissioner OP Rawat advised the applicant to appeal, describing the matter as a legal issue.
Criticism & Opposition
Opposition leaders linked the refusal to “massive, centralised manipulation,” calling for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and suspension of the SIR. Protests in New Delhi echoed these demands, citing lack of clarity around AI usage and the software’s developer, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS).
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
Sources differ on AI integration: the ECI’s RTI reply denies confirmation of AI, while opposition statements allege its presence. No independent technical verification is available, and the workflow for reviewing flagged anomalies remains undisclosed under Section 8(1)(g).
Verbatim Quotes
- “The public knows that massive manipulation has taken place. Gyanesh Kumar must go. The SIR must be suspended forthwith,” — Mr. Ramesh, Congress general secretary
- “This is a legal matter and the applicant must file an appeal to the competent authorities to seek answers to questions ECI is evading,” — Rawat, former chief election commissioner
What’s Next
The applicant may appeal the October 16 decision to the first appellate authority within 30 days. Further legal challenges could arise if opposition parties seek judicial review of the SIR’s methodology or the ECI’s refusal to disclose software details.