Full Breakdown
Two British Men Charged Over Iran-Linked Plot Near Royal Air Force (RAF) Fairford
By Drooid · · How we work
In this breakdown
01
The Charges and Alleged Offences
On October 27, 2026, the Crown Prosecution Service announced that Mohmed Abdulkarim, 24, and Nouman Essghir, 24, both London residents, have been charged under the National Security Act 2023. The offences relate to conduct alleged to have taken place between August 31 and September 28, 2026, when police say Abdulkarim acted as an intermediary for a handler believed to be working for Iran. Essghir’s charge stems from an alleged reconnaissance mission on August 22, 2026. Both men are due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court later on Tuesday; a further hearing is scheduled for November 20, 2026.
Watch
Related reporting
cbsnews
Video: Why the U.S. removed all bombers from a U.K. air base
brightcove
UK prosecutors charge two after RAF Fairford incident
ex
US Air Force withdraws all bombers from UK airbase after suspected terror plot
02
Background & Context
RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire has long served as a forward operating location for United States Air Force heavy bombers. Earlier in 2026 the base was used to launch U.S. strikes against Iran, prompting heightened diplomatic tension. Following the September incident, the United States withdrew all B-1 Lancer bombers from the airfield on security grounds. Prime Minister Andy Burnham said the activity “was almost certainly directed” by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Visual evidence
Images from the story







03
Data & Statistics
- Age of defendants: Abdulkarim 24; Essghir 24.
- Alleged timeline: Abdulkarim – Aug 31 to Sept 28; Essghir – Aug 22.
- Vehicles: Three white vans were observed near the base in late September, each containing a metal oil drum, two of which held petrol, along with water-butts and dash-cameras. No explosives were recovered.
- Arrests: Seven men were initially detained; five were released on bail after questioning, and six remain on bail pending further investigation.
- Financial flow: Prosecutors allege Abdulkarim received roughly £70,000 (about $93,000) from the handler “Ali.”
04
Official Statements & Responses
- Laurence Taylor, Assistant Commissioner for National Counter-Terrorism Policing: “In this case, we believe that country to be Iran.”
- Prosecutor (court testimony): “Shortly thereafter the message was received that there was a bomb in the vehicles and one of them called the police.”
- President Donald Trump (on bomber withdrawal): “They didn’t fly out by accident. There were some threats.”
05
Opposition – Iran’s Denial
Iran issued a denial in response to statements by Prime Minister Burnham and British police.
06
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
- Identity of the foreign intelligence service: While most British officials name Iran, the CPS statement does not explicitly name the country.
- Nature of the material in the vans: Reports describe the cargo as “petrol,” “fuel” or “diesel,” but no explosives were found.
- Role of the handler “Ali”: Prosecutors allege he acted on behalf of the Iranian state, yet concrete evidence linking him to Iran’s intelligence apparatus has not been disclosed publicly.
07
What’s Next
The defendants are scheduled to return to court on November 20, 2026 for a further hearing at the Old Bailey. Police continue to monitor the six other individuals on bail, and investigators say additional evidence may be gathered before any final determinations are made.
