Full Breakdown
Election Denial Leaders Outline Plans to Disrupt Midterm Voting
By Drooid · · How we work
In this breakdown
01
Core Plan to Disrupt Election Day
A coalition of prominent election-denial activists is outlining a series of actions intended to interfere with voting on Election Day and to generate chaos afterward. Their proposals range from urging former President Donald Trump to declare martial law, to deploying Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or the military at polling places, mandating hand-counts of ballots, demanding federal seizure of voting machines, and attempting to block certification of election results.
02
Background of Election-Denial Activity
For months, right-wing media operatives have promoted anti-voting-rights measures that have largely been blocked, stalled, or never materialized. Earlier attempts to persuade Trump to invoke a national emergency have “died in the water,” according to the source. Despite these setbacks, new conspiracy narratives continue to surface as the midterms approach.
Visual evidence
Images from the story
03
Key Figures and Their Proposals
- Steve Bannon – former Trump adviser; has advocated at least one of the above disruption tactics.
- Tina Peters – former Colorado county clerk; is promoting similar measures.
- Peter Ticktin – attorney for Peters; involved in advancing the same agenda.
- Cleta Mitchell – conservative lawyer who assisted Trump’s 2020 election challenges; has claimed without evidence that left-wing groups are illegally harvesting ballots from nursing homes.
These individuals, along with other election-denial and right-wing media personalities, are coordinating to push the outlined strategies.
04
Potential Impact and Current Status
If any of the suggested actions were implemented, they could delay vote counting, undermine public confidence, and obstruct the certification process. However, the source notes that many of the more extreme proposals—such as a Trump-declared martial law or federal seizure of voting equipment—have so far failed to gain traction. The movement’s shift toward targeting Election Day itself reflects a tactical pivot after earlier efforts were thwarted.
The outlined plans illustrate a continued effort by election-denial figures to challenge the integrity of the upcoming midterm elections, even as institutional barriers have limited the realization of many of their prior initiatives.