Full Breakdown
Former FBI Director James Comey Faces Third DOJ Espionage-Act Charge
By Drooid · · How we work
In this breakdown
01
The New Charge
On October 26, 2026 the Justice Department filed a two-count criminal information in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Prosecutors allege that, while serving as FBI director, Comey “knowingly and willfully” transmitted national-defense information to an unauthorized person in connection with a October 5, 2016 New York Times story about U.S. email surveillance. The filing was made under seal to preserve the case before the ten-year statute of limitations expires.
Watch
Related reporting
cbsnews
Video: Comey says he's "still innocent" after Trump administration attempts third round of charges
cbsnews
Video: Comey says he's "still innocent" after Trump administration attempts third round of charges
akamaized
Comey faces criminal charges for third time
02
Background & Context
This is the third federal case against Comey since President Donald Trump began his second term. A September 2025 grand-jury indictment charging him with lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding was dismissed after a judge found the prosecutor unlawfully appointed. An April 2025 indictment (unsealed April 28) accused Comey of threatening Trump with an Instagram photo of seashells spelling “86 47.” Both prosecutions followed investigations during the first Trump administration—one led by former special counsel John Durham in 2017 and a “Tropic Vortex” probe that closed without charges in early 2020.
Visual evidence
Images from the story
03
Legal Mechanics and Timeline
- October 5, 2016 – New York Times publishes the article that the government says prompted the alleged leak.
- October 26, 2026 – Criminal information filed, sealed.
- October 27, 2026 – Judge Trevor McFadden orders the filing unsealed.
- October 30, 2026 (scheduled) – Hearing on Comey’s motion to dismiss.
04
Data & Statistics
- Two counts: (1) transmission of national-defense information; (2) conspiracy to transmit that information.
- The alleged conduct occurred exactly ten years before the filing, matching the statutory deadline.
- No grand-jury indictment has been obtained; the government relies on a “criminal information” to toll the limitations period.
05
Official Statements & Responses
Comey’s lawyers argue the statute applies only to grand-jury indictments, making the information “time-barred.”
06
Criticism & Opposition
Former prosecutor Sarah Krissoff said, “Somebody is dictating this process, saying, ‘Bring the case.’”
07
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
The Justice Department maintains that filing a criminal information can pause the ten-year limitations period, citing appellate precedent. Legal analysts note that such a filing is unusual and may not satisfy the statutory requirement for a grand-jury indictment, creating a direct dispute over the proper interpretation of the limitations rule.
08
Verbatim Quotes
- “Well, they’re back again. It would almost be funny if it weren’t such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice, one that we cannot become numb to,” — James Comey
- “Filing a placeholder charge the defendant can’t be tried on, on the last possible day, under seal, in the third case against the same man, is not routine or ‘widely recognized.’ It is exactly what it appears to be: vindictive,” — Greg Rosen, DOJ spokesperson
- “Filing a criminal information to toll the statute of limitations is a widely recognized practice in federal court and has been approved by multiple Circuit Courts of Appeals.” — Justice Department
- “I have never heard of proceeding by information to toll the statute of limitations. Most prosecutors you have ever dealt with have never heard of that. This seems to be a way to do an end-run around the statute of limitations and keep a case alive that deserved to die 9 years ago,” — Michael Bromwich, former DOJ inspector general
09
What’s Next
The October 30, 2026 hearing will address Comey’s motion to dismiss on statute-of-limitations grounds. The court’s decision will determine whether the Department can seek a grand-jury indictment or must dismiss the case as “time-barred.” No further dates have been announced.