Full Breakdown
NFL Sunday Ticket Antitrust Verdict Revived by Ninth Circuit
By Drooid · · How we work
In this breakdown
01
Core Event: Appeals Court Restores Jury’s Liability Finding and Orders New Damages Trial
A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a district-court judgment that had nullified a jury’s antitrust verdict against the National Football League (NFL). The panel reinstated the jury’s finding that the league’s “Sunday Ticket” distribution arrangement violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, but it upheld the lower court’s order for a new trial on the amount of damages. The case is now remanded to the district court for that determination.
02
Background & Context
The class-action lawsuit was filed in 2015 by residential and commercial subscribers of DIRECTV who alleged that the NFL’s exclusive out-of-market package forced consumers to purchase a bundled service, inflating prices and suppressing competition. The league’s ability to pool media rights for individual franchises is protected by the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, an antitrust exemption that has come under scrutiny as streaming platforms reshape sports distribution. The plaintiffs argued that the exemption should not shield the NFL’s “Sunday Ticket” arrangement, which had been carried by DIRECTV from its launch in 1994 until the package moved to YouTube TV in 2023.
03
Data & Statistics
- The 2024 jury awarded roughly $4.6 billion to residential subscribers and $96 million to commercial customers.
- Earlier reporting cited a $4.7 billion total verdict, reflecting a slight discrepancy among sources.
- Federal antitrust law permits treble damages, meaning the liability could exceed $14 billion if the original award were upheld.
- The NFL’s current seven-year agreement with Alphabet’s YouTube TV reportedly values the “Sunday Ticket” distribution rights at $14 billion.
04
Official Statements & Responses
- The new presiding judge described the case as a “landmark issue of national importance,” citing numerous amicus briefs filed in the appeal.
- Fox Corporation and Sinclair Broadcast Group submitted public comments to the Federal Communications Commission urging an examination of the Sports Broadcasting Act’s scope as it applies to streaming.
- Federal investigators reportedly opened a probe into the NFL’s streaming arrangements earlier in the summer, underscoring governmental interest in the matter.
05
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
Sources differ on the precise size of the original jury award: some cite a $4.7 billion total, while others break the award into $4.6 billion for residential subscribers and $96 million for commercial customers. The appellate panel’s order does not resolve this numerical inconsistency, leaving the exact liability figure unsettled pending the new damages trial.
06
What’s Next
The district court will conduct a fresh trial to determine the NFL’s monetary liability, focusing solely on damages rather than the underlying antitrust question. The league retains the option to appeal the Ninth Circuit’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. Legal analyst Eriq Gardner has suggested that the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court to decide whether the league’s collective rights-pooling practice constitutes an antitrust violation.
07
Verbatim Quotes
- “I listened to the hearing. To me, it sounds like the Ninth Circuit is ready to reverse the judge and revive the case,” — Eriq Gardner, puck legal analyst